<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawReader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.lawreader.com</link>
	<description>The Law behind the News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Illinois joins six other states which hold that med mal caps are unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=3002</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=3002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=3002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Feb. 4, 2010 in the case of Lebron v. Gottlief Memorial Hospital, the Supreme Court of Illinois struck down the cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases, holding that the cap, which had limited damages to $500,000 for doctors and $1,000,000 for hospitals, is unconstitutional because the law violates &#8220;separation of powers&#8221; doctrine.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3002</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does SB 87 apply to County Law Libraries?</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=3000</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=3000#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=3000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate has passed SB 87 which requires financial accounting of funds received and dispursed by the Ky. Assoc. of Counties and the Ky. League of Cities.   An amendment also imposes a reporting duty on affiliated organizations which appear to include County Law Libraries.
The law as it currently exists would require each entity to maintain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3000</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Court Limits Evidence in DUI case</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2998</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2998#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Limit on evidence in drunk driving cases upheld
By Alex De Grand, Legal Writer, State Bar of Wisconsin
Feb. 2, 2010 – Evidence of a preliminary breath test (PBT) in a drunk driving case remains inadmissible even if an expert relies on it to form an opinion, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held today.
In State v. Fischer, 207AP1898, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2998</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAN THE JUDICIARY MANDATE THAT THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH ADEQUATELY FUND THE COURT SYSTEM?</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2995</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2995#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


 
 
 
Courts over the years have protested cuts in their budgets by the Executive Branch by threatening to mandate a budget and to order the Executive Branch to fund the budget as drawn up by the courts.
 
The judiciary in New York has threatened to do this, but never carried through with their threat.
 
Now, possibly for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2995</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOC  struggles to pay for new courthouses</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2993</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2993#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state court system laid off 47 people last fall, and judicial officials say they&#8217;re looking at even more drastic measures in the upcoming budget cycle.
Since 2000, $880 million has been appropriated for new courthouses that are part of a program designed by former Chief Justice Joseph E. Lambert that was aimed at putting a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2993</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Alito Breaches Etiquette and Shows Distaste Over Obama&#8217;s Criticism of  Corporate Ruling re: Campaign Finance</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2991</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2991#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
WASHINGTON (Jan. 27) &#8212; It wasn&#8217;t quite &#8220;You lie!&#8221; but a shaking of the head and a muttered rebuke from Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has sent the lip-reading blogosphere into a tizzy after President Barack Obama&#8217;s State of the Union address.
The moment came a little more than halfway into Obama&#8217;s speech, when the president [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2991</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Ends Confrontation Clause Challenge &#8211; Upholds Forensic Expert Ruling in Melendez-Diaz case.</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2989</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2989#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
During oral arguments Jan. 11 in Briscoe v. Virginia, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spent considerable time defending the precedent at issue, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, in which he wrote the majority opinion That was the Confrontation Clause decision finding that forensic evidence needed to be presented in person, not by affidavit, so it could be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2989</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling on Campaign Finance in Citizen&#8217;s United v. Federal Election Commission:</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2986</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2986#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan 24 2010,
The Supreme Paradox: When the Court Overrides Congress  by Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
The paradox of the United States Supreme Court is that, from one perspective, it is a traditional judicial institution deciding individual cases. But from another perspective, it makes broad value choices in the name of constitutional interpretation; strikes down acts of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2986</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES THAT VOIR DIRE MUST BE OPEN TO PUBLIC</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2984</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2984#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 7-2 vote on Jan. 19th, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a criminal defendant&#8217;s right to a public trial covers the process of jury selection.  The Justices said in the Georgia case, Preston v. Jordan, that a screening of jurors should be open to the public.
The court said some situation may require the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2984</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KBA Board recommends disbarment Melbourne Mills- Denies Reinstatement of Lester Burns</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2982</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2982#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The board of the Kentucky Bar Association decided Friday that two of the most colorful and controversial figures in Kentucky legal history should not practice law.
The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association voted 14-1 to permanently disbar Melbourne Mills Jr. of Lexington for his part in a controversial $200 million fen-phen settlement.  Mills [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2982</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sixth Circuit Ct. of Appeals Reverses Kentucky Ten Commandments Decision</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2980</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2980#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A Kentucky county can restore a display that included the Ten Commandments along with other historical documents after a split federal appeals court ruled Thursday that there&#8217;s no evidence the county intended to mount a religious display on public grounds.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 vote, vacated an injunction barring Grayson [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2980</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Ct. Overrules 6th Circuit on Federal Habeas Corpus Rule</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2977</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2977#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 



 
 



[JURIST] The US Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled] unanimously in Smith v. Spisak that the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit contravened the directives of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) by extending Mills v. Maryland [opinion text] to resolve in a habeas petitioner&#8217;s favor questions that were not decided or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2977</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State’s e-Transparency site now includes Judicial Branch expenditures and contracts, salary information</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2975</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2975#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
FRANKFORT, Ky. – Gov. Steve Beshear and Chief Justice John D. Minton Jr. today announced that the state’s judicial branch has joined the Governor’s e-Transparency Web site.
Kentucky’s Open Door, online at www.OpenDoor.KY.gov, has been upgraded to include all Judicial Branch expenditure and contract data.  Also available is information on all constitutional offices, the executive branch, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2975</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court revisits Melendez-Diaz ruling re: right of defendant to confront forensic experts &#8211;  States seek to shift burden to  Defendant to call government witness for cross-examination</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2973</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2973#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Washington Post Staff Writer  Tuesday, January 12, 2010
It was just a little more than six months ago that the Supreme Court decided that defendants must have the opportunity to challenge those who prepare forensic reports before they are admitted into evidence. So Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that opinion, wanted to know why his colleagues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2973</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The drama continues in Shelby County.  Major win goes to District Judge Donna Dutton who was upheld by Ct. of Appeals.</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2971</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2971#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday Jan. 8, 2009 the Court of Appeals set aside a writ of prohibition that the County Attorney obtained from the Circuit Judge.  
 The Circuit Judge denied the right of the District Judge  Donna Dutton, to order that the Commonwealth bring a police officer to a pre-trial hearing.  The Circuit Judge had reasoned that something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2971</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Products Liability Suit: Chemicals in Infant car seat caused Permanent Disfigurement of Child</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2969</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2969#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Excerpted from Cincinnati Enquirer  Jan 8, 2009
The infant car seat that was supposed to protect a baby girl ended up leaving her “permanently disfigured,” a Butler County couple claim in a lawsuit filed in Common Pleas Court.
“She will be scarred forever,” says Dana Luther, a Cincinnati attorney who filed the suit against Graco Children’s Products [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2969</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOC SERVICE WHICH PROVIDES CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK TO CHARGE $15 PER REPORT  &#8211; Public can obtain criminal records check online, by mail of drive-thru service in Frankfort</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2967</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2967#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FRANKFORT, Ky. – The Administrative Office of the Courts today announced changes to its service that provides criminal background reports. The following changes will be effective Jan. 19, 2010:
•  There will be a standard fee of $15 for all criminal background reports.
•   A new automated program, AOCFastCheck, will allow the public to request and receive reports online.
•   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2967</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Settles Prosecutorial Misconduct Civil CaseWhich Was Pending in U.S. Supreme Court &#8211; Pottwattamie County, Iowa pays $12 million to two defendants who were framed by prosecutors</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2965</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2965#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  On Monday Jan. 4, 2010,  the U.S. Supreme Court granted petitioners’ motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 in Pottawattamie County v. McGhee, 08–1065, which involved whether prosecutors who try a case are entitled to immunity when sued for allegedly procuring before trial false evidence to frame a criminal defendant. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2965</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FEDERAL COURT DISMISSES FEDERAL CHARGES AGAINST  BLACKWATER GUNMEN DUE TO PROSECUTORS VIOLATION OF IMMUNITY RULE REGARDING COMPELLED STATEMENTS-   The &#8220;taint team&#8221; couldn&#8217;t save this prosecution  &#8211; This marks the fourth recent example in which judges have tossed out cases citing Justice Department abuse.</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2963</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2963#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
The Wall Street Journal   Jan. 4, 2009 
 Another example of prosecutorial misconduct in a political case?
No, not as the left would have it, that Blackwater still exists. The scandal is that the Justice Department&#8217;s case against five former security guards for the military contractor unraveled late last week in what appears to be another instance of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2963</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court Chief Justice Issues Year End Report on Federal Judiciary</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2961</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2961#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. issued an unusually brief year-end report on the federal judiciary Thursday in his capacity as head of the Judicial Conference of the United States [official website], declining to address judiciary needs as done in previous years. On a single page, the 2009 report said the federal courts were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2961</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal appeals court sets limits on police use of Tasers</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2959</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2959#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Dec. 28, 2009
A federal appeals court on Monday issued one of the most comprehensive rulings yet limiting police use of Tasers against low-level offenders who seem to pose little threat and may be mentally ill.
In a case out of San Diego County, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals criticized an officer who, without warning, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2959</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Court Judge Tama Gormley Once Again Reprimanded by Judicial Conduct Commission</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2957</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2957#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission on Dec. 28th.  issued a public reprimand of Family Court Judge Tamra Gormley.  In a 5-1 vote, the commission found Gormley denied changes in child support payments to employees of Toyota Motor Manufacturing, their spouses and their ex-spouses.
Gormley ruled in May that no Toyota employee in three counties could have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2957</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Judge Censured for Recusals Over Lack of Pay Raise</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2955</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2955#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Joel Stashenko  December 29, 2009
ALBANY &#8211; A western New York judge should be censured for trying to organize other judges to recuse themselves from cases involving the law firms of state legislators, who have denied the judiciary a pay raise since 1999, the Commission on Judicial Conduct said today.
Cattaraugus County Judge Larry M. Himelein [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2955</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IOWA STATE JUDGES ARE SOME OF THE BEST PAID IN THE NATION</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2953</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2953#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 State judges in Iowa collect above-average salaries compared with their peers nationwide, but also have seen their net pay decrease in recent years, a review of court data shows.
District judges ranked 18th among states, appeals judges ranked 16th and associate high court judges ranked 14th in terms of pay this year, a national report published [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2953</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator McConnell Once Again Nominates Cincinnati Lawyer to Represent Kentucky Interests &#8211; Can&#8217;t he find qualified Kentucky lawyers for advancement?</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2951</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2951#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Kentucky has 16,000 licensed lawyers.   Our state is full of highly competent lawyers who practice law here, were educated here, and have spent their adult lives as participants in legal activities here.  However once again our Senior Senator has nominated a Cincinnati lawyer to represent the interests of Kentuckians.
The last Federal Judge appointed in Kentucky [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2951</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the KBA Inquiry Commission and Bar Counsel Crossed the Line in Expanding Limits on Attorneys Free Speech Rights?</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2949</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2949#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has the KBA Inquiry Commission and Bar Counsel Crossed the Line in Expanding Limits on Attorneys Free Speech Rights?  
Editorial by LawReader Senior Editor Stan Billingsley -  Dec. 23, 2009
   SCR 3.130 8.2(4) has been used by the KBA Inquiry Commission to &#8220;warn&#8221; former State Senator John M. Berry Jr. of New Castle, Ky. that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2949</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT ADOPTS NEW RULE ALLOWING ENTIRE COURT TO VOTE TO RECUSE A SUPREME CT. JUSTICE WHO IS BIASED AND REFUSES TO RECUSE HIMSELF</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2947</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2947#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    On Nov. 25, the high court, in a 4-3 vote the Michigan Supreme Court changed its rules on when justices should be banned from deciding cases. The old rule was that justices decided for themselves when they should be recused, which is the same way the U.S. Supreme Court does it. The new rule [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2947</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Cites Emergency Exception and Allows Warrantless Entry of Home by Police</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2945</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2945#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


When can police enter a house without a warrant under the emergency aid exception to the Fourth Amendment?  The court held: Officers need only an objective reasonable basis for believing that medical assistance is needed or someone is in danger.
The Case: Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher, Docket No. 09-91 (2009)



 


 



The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2945</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KENTUCKY HAS ADOPTED A STATUTORY SYSTEM FOR PAYMENT OF CIVIL CLAIM AWARDS AGAINST PROSECUTORS</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2943</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2943#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Independence attorney Eric Deters has filed two separate lawsuits on behalf of two different clients against Kenton Commonwealth Attorney Rob Sanders.  If a judgment is actually entered against Sanders, he most likely will be protected financially by KRS 15.753 which provides for compensation against civil judgments rendered against Kentucky prosecutors.
(The following is an excerpt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2943</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Appeals Accuses California Attorney General Lawyers of Lying</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2941</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2941#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
San Francisco Chronicle    Dec. 22,2009
SAN FRANCISCO &#8211; A federal appeals court bluntly accused the Schwarzenegger administration and state Attorney General Jerry Brown&#8217;s office on Monday of  lying about its defense of cuts in Medi-Cal fees.

Feds&#8217; tactics in fighting wildfire questioned 12.22.09

Lawyers in Brown&#8217;s office committed a &#8220;clear violation&#8221; of State Bar rules that prohibit attorneys from  misleading [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2941</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Deters files Second Lawsuit  in a month naming Kenton Commonwealth Attorney Rob Sanders as Defendant.</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2939</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2939#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 



Independence  attorney Eric Deters has filed a lawsuit on behalf of his client Terry Williams Jr. alleging malicious prosecution by Kenton Commonwealth Attorney Rob Sanders. The suit claims that  criminal charges were brought by Sanders in retaliation for Williams filing a federal civil rights lawsuit against the police. The federal case is pending in U.S. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2939</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Gayle Hoffman of Campbell Family Court is inviting applications for a Law Clerk.</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2937</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2937#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The job pays $26,220 a year.  Applicants must be a licensed lawyer.
 Job Required Knowledge
 MUST BE A MEMBER OF THE KY BAR ASSOCIATION OR BE TAKING EVERY REASONABLE STEP TO GAIN ADMISSION
Job Skills/Abilities
 EXCELLENT FORMAL WRITING SKILL
 EXCELLENT INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Job Duties
 PERFORM LEGAL RESEARCH AND RECORD ANALYSIS PERTAINING TO CASES BEFORE THE COURT
 PREPARE [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2937</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government searches limited  &#8211;  judicial ruling involving drug tests for athletes has blossomed into a huge Fourth Amendment case</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2935</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2935#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
A controversial and surprisingly overlooked judicial ruling has placed unprecedented restrictions on the federal government&#8217;s ability to seize information stored on personal computers, e-mail servers, and other ubiquitous electronic devices. The decision, which the Obama administration says has halted or stymied several ongoing criminal investigations, has established new requirements for obtaining computer search warrants that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2935</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frustrated with fantasy football? Try Fantasy Supreme Court &#8211; New Web Site Lets you predict outcome of upcoming decisions</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2933</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2933#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 

predict the outcome of high court cases  &#8211;Students can play the game for free; others can play for $10 or less

Washington (CNN) &#8212; Forget about baseball, football and the Academy Awards. The hottest new fantasy-league game involves the Supreme Court.
 
A month-old Web site called FantasySCOTUS.net allows people to predict all of the high court&#8217;s pending [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2933</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court  Refuses Review of Immunity of Gun Manufacturer&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2931</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2931#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dec. 14, 2009 &#8211; The Supreme Court has turned away a new challenge to a 2005 law that gives gun manufacturers immunity from lawsuits by shooting victims.
The justices on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Hector Adames Jr. to revive his lawsuit against the Beretta U.S.A. Corp. over the accidental shooting death of his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2931</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNIV. of  TENNESSEE &#8221; HOSTESSES&#8221; SPARK NCAA INVESTIGATION OF RECRUITING VIOLATIONS</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2929</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2929#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Univ. of Tennessee is alleged to have being using up to 100 attractive co-ed hostesses to meet and greet recruits for UT athletic teams.   Have the Hostesses crossed the line?
A news report contained the following comments about the conduct of the hostesses:
&#8220;Keith Easterwood, a veteran summer basketball coach, said that on a visit last [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2929</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Upholds 6th. Circuit Ruling that  (RICO) Racketeering Suit May Proceed Against Employer and Worker&#8217;s Comp. Insurance Adjustor for conspiring to deny Benefits &#8211; It is claimed they sought fraudulent medical opinions and unqualified doctors to defeat worker claims</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2927</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2927#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 10, 2009
Court has declined to hear a workers’ compensation case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in which the appeals court found that the plaintiffs could sue their employer and its workers’ compensation claims adjuster under federal racketeering laws.
In Paul Brown et al. vs. Cassens Transport Co. et al., the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2927</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE JOHN M. BERRY JR. LETTER WHICH UPSET THE LEGISLATIVE ETHICS COMMISSION AND SPARKED A WARNING FROM THE KBA INQUIRY COMMISSION, AND A FEDERAL LAWSUIT.</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2925</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2925#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
THE FOLLOWING LETTER WAS WRITTEN BY NEW CASTLE ATTORNEY JOHN M. BERRY, JR. A FORMER STATE  SENATOR.  THIS LETTER IS AN EXHIBIT IN A FEDERAL CIVIL SUIT FILED BY JOHN M. BERRY, JR. AND THE ACLU AGAINST THE KBA INQUIRY COMMISSION.
AS A RESULT OF THIS LETTER THE KBA INQUIRY COMMISSION CONDUCTED AN &#8220;INVESTIGATION&#8221; AND LATER [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2925</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court  hears Tampa case on Miranda rights &#8211; Must Police Specifically Tell suspect of right to have attorney present during questioning?</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2923</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday pointedly questioned why police in a Tampa criminal case didn&#8217;t explicitly tell a suspect of his right to an attorney during an interrogation.
A majority of justices appeared inclined to give law enforcement more guidance about how to inform a suspect of his Miranda rights to end confusion about what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2923</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court rules on emergency aid exception to Fourth Amendment</title>
		<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2921</link>
		<comments>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2921#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 The US Supreme Court on Monday summarily reversed and remanded  a Michigan Court of Appeals decision that found officers violated a defendant&#8217;s Fourth Amendment  rights when they entered his home. In a per curiam opinion, the Court relied on its 2006 ruling in Brigham City v. Stuart to conclude that the officers correctly applied the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2921</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
