<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Kentucky Supreme Court Demonstrates Reason Over Passion In Decision that Limits Prejudicial Evidence Which Has No Probative Value By Restricting so called  “Police Officer Expert” Medical Testimony and Holding that Evidence of Drug Use With No Proof of Impairment Can Not Be Introduced.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.lawreader.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.lawreader.com/?p=2851</link>
	<description>The Law behind the News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri,  2 Apr 2010 18:22:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
