Numerous vacancies in Judicial Offices, filing date Aug. 12t.

July 19th, 2008


The Office of the Secretary of State has been informed of the following vacancies in office.  Potential candidates/parties have until 4:00 p.m EDT, August 12, 2008, to file and place the candidate’s name on the ballot to fill the unexpired term.

Circuit Judges

Circuit Judge – 6th Judicial Circuit, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 2, 2008
   Counties affected: Daviess
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Thomas O. Castlen)

Circuit Judge – Family Court 18th Judicial Circuit, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 1, 2008
   Counties affected: Harrison, Nicholas, Pendleton, Robertson
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of David E. Melcher)

Circuit Judge – 22nd Judicial Circuit, Division 7
   Vacancy effective: June 2, 2008
   Counties affected: Fayette
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Sheila R. Isaac)

Circuit Judge – 25th Judicial Circuit, Division 1
   Vacancy effective: June 27, 2008 4:30 p.m. ET
   Counties affected: Clark and Madison
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Julia Hylton Adams)

Circuit Judge – 25th Judicial Circuit, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 30, 2008
   Counties affected: Clark and Madison 12:00 p.m. ET
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of William T. Jennings)

Circuit Judge – 27th Judicial Circuit, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 30, 2008 4:00 p.m. ET
   Counties affected: Knox and Laurel
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Roderick Messer)

Circuit Judge – 30th Judicial Circuit, Division 10
   Vacancy effective: April 21, 2008
   Counties affected: Jefferson
   (Vacancy occurred by the death of Kathleen Voor Montano)

District Judges

District Judge – 22nd Judicial District, Division 4
   Vacancy effective: June 1, 2008
   Counties affected: Fayette
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of David F. Hayse)

District Judge – 30th Judicial District, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 2, 2008
   Counties affected: Jefferson
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Kevin W. Delahanty)

District Judge – 30th Judicial District, Division 8
   Vacancy effective: June 3, 2008
   Counties affected: Jefferson
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Deborah J. Deweese)
 District Judge – 48th Judicial District, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 30, 2008
   Counties affected:  Franklin
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of William Guy Hart)

District Judge – 51st Judicial District, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 2, 2008
   Counties affected: Henderson
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Kenton J. Watson)
District Judge – 55th Judicial District, Division 2
   Vacancy effective: June 30, 2008
   Counties affected: Bullitt
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Bailey Taylor)

Supreme Court Justices

Supreme Court Justice –Third Supreme Court District
          Vacancy effective: June 27, 2008
          Counties affected:  Adair, Bell, Casey, Clay, Clinton, Cumberland, Estill, Garrard, Green, Jackson, Knox, Laurel, Lee, Leslie, Lincoln, Marion, McCreary, Metcalfe, Monroe, Nelson, Pulaski, Rockcastle, Russell, Taylor, Washington, Wayne, and Whitley

          (Vacancy occurred by the Retirement of Chief Justice Joseph E. Lambert)

Other Vacancies

Commonwealth Attorney
27th Judicial Circuit
   Counties of:  Knox and Laurel
   (Vacancy occurred by the resignation of Danny Evans)*
*Please note that this vacancy is for a partisan office and different procedures apply.

Texas Supreme Court upholds written hourly fee agreement

July 19th, 2008


Mary Alice Robbins Texas Lawyer July 19, 2008

A written attorney fee agreement that specifies only hourly rates but is not ambiguous cannot be modified by evidence that the parties agreed orally to cap the fees, the Texas Supreme Court held in a Houston lawyer’s almost decade-old case against a former client.

“[T]he absence of a fixed total price for services does not indicate a failure of the parties to reach a meeting of the minds with regards to the essential terms of the contract,” the Supreme Court wrote in its July 11 per curiam opinion in Sacks v. Haden. In a second per curiam opinion in Sacks, the court addressed a turnover order issued by the trial court.

With no dissents, the Supreme Court reversed a decision by Houston’s 1st Court of Appeals and reinstated Harris County Court-at-Law No. 2′s judgment awarding the Sacks Firm in Houston and its president, David J. Sacks, $30,214 on the firm’s breach-of-contract claims against Charles McIntyre Haden Jr. and his business, Haden & Co. The high court’s decision also reinstated the court-at-law’s judgment awarding Sacks and his firm about $120,000 in attorney fees incurred in pursuing the contract claims against Haden and his company.

In a 2-1 decision, the

1st Court

held in 2007 that whether the parties’ minds met on the legal fees and Haden’s obligation to pay those fees were questions of fact that a jury should decide and remanded the case to Harris County Court-at-Law No. 2 for a trial.

“The Supreme Court brought order back to the law,” Sacks says of the high court’s decision.

If a lawyer has a contract with a client and spends thousands of dollars in time on the case, the client cannot say two or three years later that there is a $10,000 cap on the fee, Sacks says.

Houston solo Richard Countiss, Haden’s attorney, says Haden will file a motion for rehearing with the Supreme Court. “We’re extremely disappointed,” Countiss says.

Countiss says the Supreme Court decided the case on the parol evidence rule without addressing Haden’s challenge to the adequacy of the affidavit Sacks presented to the trial court to justify the thousands in dollars in fees Sacks claimed he was owed for trying to collect payment from Haden.

“If you’re going to allow the kind of windfall Mr. Sacks enjoyed, you should explain why,” Countiss says.

In 1997, Haden hired Sacks to prepare a brief to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in an appeal of an adverse judgment against Haden and his company in Haden v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., a commercial landlord-tenant dispute. Sacks set out his hourly rates and those of other lawyers and paralegals in his firm in an Aug. 4, 1997, engagement letter to Haden. Sacks signed the engagement letter in which he requested a $10,000 retainer.

The Supreme Court’s opinion provides the following background on what happened after Sacks sent the engagement letter: Haden sent a check for $5,000 to the Sacks Firm, along with a letter in which Haden wrote: “Also enclosed is an executed copy of your Aug. 4, 1997, letter indicating that I have acknowledged acceptance of your fee agreement on behalf of Haden & Co. and myself, except that the initial retainer amount has been reduced to $5,000 per our agreement.” Sacks filed a brief in Haden’s appeal to the 5th Circuit and sent Haden an invoice in the amount of $37,259 for legal services. Sacks also filed a reply brief that responded to the opponent in the landlord-tenant dispute and sent Haden an invoice showing $40,304 in total charges but giving Haden credit for the $5,000 retainer fee. While the invoice indicated an outstanding balance of $35,304, Haden paid only an additional $5,000. Over the next two years, Sacks requested payment of the balance on the attorney fees, but Haden contested the amount owed and contended that Sacks was only supposed to review the brief prepared by Haden’s trial counsel.

In September 1998, the 5th Circuit affirmed the adverse judgment of $66,363 that U.S. District Judge Nancy Atlas had awarded against Haden and his company in Metropolitan Life. However, the 5th Circuit ruled partially in favor of Haden and his company by vacating Atlas’ dismissal of a promissory-estoppel counterclaim that Haden and the company made.

Sacks and his firm sued Haden and his company in 1999 in Harris County Court-at-Law No. 2, asserting claims for, among other things, breach of contract, quantum meruit and Deceptive Trade Practices Act violations. In 2000, the court-at-law rendered a partial summary judgment in favor of Sacks and his firm, ruling that they were entitled to attorney fees of about $30,000 incurred in preparing the briefs for Haden’s appeal and for an unspecified amount of attorneys’ fees incurred in pursuing the contract claim. The court-at-law also held that Haden and his company take nothing on his counterclaims against Sacks and his firm for unconscionable acts, fraud, DTPA violations, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract.

As noted in the Supreme Court’s opinion, Sacks and the firm sought summary judgment on the reasonableness of the attorney fees incurred in their collection effort. The court-at-law awarded Sacks and the firm an additional $75,887 in attorney fees at the trial level and another $45,000 for fees if there was an appeal.

Haden and his company appealed to the

1st Court

, which in 2006 issued a unanimous decision affirming the court-at-law’s judgment in an opinion written by Justice Elsa Acala. After Haden filed a motion for rehearing, however, the

1st Court

reversed its original holding in a 2-1 decision. Chief Justice Sherry Radack wrote the March 8, 2007, majority opinion on rehearing, in which Justice Evelyn Keyes joined.

The 1st Court majority concluded that Haden’s evidence that he had an oral agreement with Sacks to cap the attorney fees at $10,000 was admissible as a defense to Sacks’ claim, because the engagement-letter contract that Sacks sent to Haden did not expressly state whether the parties had agreed to an open account or a flat maximum fee.

Haden argued to the

1st Court

and to the Supreme Court that he offered evidence of “consistent collateral conditions” when he testified in the court-at-law that he and Sacks had an oral agreement to cap the fee amount.

Because the engagement-letter contract did not spell out whether the parties had agreed to an open account or a flat maximum fee, the

1st Court

concluded that Haden’s evidence of an oral agreement capping the attorney fees at $10,000 was admissible in defense to Sack’s claim under the collateral-and-consistent exception to the parol evidence rule. According to the Supreme Court’s opinion, the

1st Court

raised the “meeting of the minds” issue sua sponte and concluded that, because there was not a clear statement that identified the fee agreement as an open account, there was a question where the parties had a meeting of the minds on Haden’s obligation.

The Supreme Court held that the

1st Court

erred in holding that there was no meeting of the minds necessary to form a binding contract. The high court further held that the

1st Court

erred in holding that the parol evidence rule did not bar Haden’s evidence that he and Sacks had an oral agreement capping the fees.

Haden argued to the

1st Court

and the Supreme Court that a fee agreement must state specifically that the hourly fees would accrue without limit for the agreement to be unambiguous and enforceable.

“But the lack of such explicit language is irrelevant if the agreement can be reasonably interpreted only one way. … We have never held that an open-ended hourly fee agreement will be enforced only if it expressly states there is no cap on fees, and we decline to do so now,” the Supreme Court said in Sacks.

Claude Ducloux, an Austin lawyer who represents attorneys in the State Bar of Texas grievance process and is knowledgeable about legal ethics but who is not involved in the case, says the Supreme Court’s ruling assures lawyers that when they have an unambiguous agreement with a client, that agreement is going to be valid and the client cannot inject testimony into the case that the agreement says something else.

“All I can say for the tens of thousands of us who very regularly enter into hourly fee agreements with hundreds of clients is a collective ‘whew!’ ” says Ducloux, a principal in Hill, Ducloux, Carnes & de la Garza.


In a separate per curiam opinion in Sacks, the Supreme Court reversed the

1st Court

‘s decision regarding the trial court’s turnover order. The Supreme Court remanded that part of the case to the

1st Court

. The trial court had awarded Sacks and his firm $90,000 in a turnover order. According to that Supreme Court opinion, when Haden failed to supersede the judgment against him and his business on Sacks’ breach-of-contract claim, Sacks and the firm incurred considerable expense to secure a turnover order under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code §31.002(e), have a receiver appointed to prevent prejudgment transfer of Haden’s assets and seek dismissal of Haden’s bankruptcy filings.

Haden had sought Chapter 13 relief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, but that court dismissed his bankruptcy claim in December 2001. The

1st Court

had reversed the turnover order when it reversed the underlying judgment on Sacks’ breach-of-contract claim, the Supreme Court noted in its opinion.

Sacks estimates that, with interest compounding at a rate of 10 percent annually, Haden and his company owe Sacks more than $400,000. But Sacks says he has spent “a lot more than I’ll ever see” in trying to collect his fees.

It’s been a legal victory, Sacks says of the Supreme Court’s rulings. “It hasn’t been a financial win.”

San Francisco Ballot Referendum seeks to name Sewer Plant after President Bush

July 19th, 2008

San Francisco Chronicle – July 16, 2008 

San Francisco voters will be asked to decide whether to name a city sewage plant in honor of President Bush, after a satiric measure qualified for the November ballot Thursday.

Backers of the measure, who for several months circulated a petition to place the measure on the ballot, turned in more than 12,000 signatures on July 7, said organizer Brian McConnell. The Department of Elections on Thursday informed those supporters, the self-proclaimed Presidential Memorial Commission, that they had enough valid signatures – a minimum of 7,168 registered San Francisco voters – to qualify for the November ballot.

McConnell, who came up with the idea over beers with friends, often donned an Uncle Sam outfit to drum up support for the petition. The all-volunteer group of signature gatherers often carried around an American flag and blasted patriotic music from a boom box to attract attention. He said the campaign to pass the measure will be an equally grassroots effort.

The measure, if passed, would rename the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant the George W. Bush Sewage Plant. McConnell said the intent is to remember the Bush administration and what the group sees as the president’s mistakes, including the war in Iraq.

Some people aren’t laughing, including the San Francisco Republican Party, which sees the measure as an embarrassment, even to this famously liberal city. Chairman Howard Epstein has vowed to fight the measure with all means available to him.

A White House spokeswoman, when asked about the measure several weeks ago, refused to comment

13 Americans have been electrocuted, many more injured by Faulty Electrical Risks at Bases in Iraq –Contractor KBR blamed – Pentagon Ignored complaints

July 19th, 2008


By JAMES RISEN  - New York Times  July 18, 2008


KBR, Inc. (formerly Kellogg Brown & Root) is an American engineering and construction company, formerly a subsidiary of Halliburton, based in Houston


WASHINGTON — Shoddy electrical work by private contractors on United States military bases in Iraq is widespread and dangerous, causing more deaths and injuries from fires and shocks than the Pentagon has acknowledged, according to internal Army documents.


During just one six-month period — August 2006 through January 2007 — at least 283 electrical fires destroyed or damaged American military facilities in Iraq, including the military’s largest dining hall in the country, documents obtained by The New York Times show. Two soldiers died in an electrical fire at their base near Tikrit in 2006, the records note, while another was injured while jumping from a burning guard tower in May 2007.


And while the Pentagon has previously reported that 13 Americans have been electrocuted in Iraq, many more have been injured, some seriously, by shocks, according to the documents. A log compiled earlier this year at one building complex in Baghdad disclosed that soldiers complained of receiving electrical shocks in their living quarters on an almost daily basis.


Electrical problems were the most urgent noncombat safety hazard for soldiers in Iraq, according to an Army survey issued in February 2007. It noted “a safety threat theaterwide created by the poor-quality electrical fixtures procured and installed, sometimes incorrectly, thus resulting in a significant number of fires.”


The Army report said KBR, the Houston-based company that is responsible for providing basic services for American troops in Iraq, including housing, did its own study and found a “systemic problem” with electrical work.

But the Pentagon did little to address the issue until a Green Beret, Staff Sgt. Ryan D. Maseth, was electrocuted in January while showering. His death, caused by poor electrical grounding, drew the attention of lawmakers and Pentagon leaders after his family pushed for answers. Congress and the Pentagon’s inspector general have begun investigations, and this month senior Army officials ordered electrical inspections of all buildings in Iraq maintained by KBR.


“We consider this to be a very serious issue,” Chris Isleib, a Pentagon spokesman, said Thursday in an e-mail message, while declining to comment on the findings in the Army documents.


Heather Browne, a KBR spokeswoman, would not comment about a company safety study or the reports of electrical fires or shocks, but she said KBR had found no evidence of a link between its work and the electrocutions. She added, “KBR’s commitment to the safety of all employees and those the company serves remains unwavering.”

In public statements, Pentagon officials have not addressed the scope of the hazards, instead mostly focusing on the circumstances surrounding the death of Sergeant Maseth, who lived near Pittsburgh.


But the internal documents, including dozens of memos, e-mail messages and reports from the Army, the Defense Contract Management Agency and other agencies, show that electrical problems were widely recognized as a major safety threat among Pentagon contracting experts. It is impossible to determine the exact number of the resulting deaths and injuries because no single document tallies them up. (The records were compiled for Congressional and Pentagon investigators and obtained independently by The Times.)

The 2007 safety survey was ordered by the top official in Iraq for the Defense Contract Management Agency, which oversees contractors, after the October 2006 electrical fire that killed two soldiers near Tikrit. Paul Dickinson, a Pentagon safety specialist who wrote the report, confirmed its findings, but did not elaborate.


Senior Pentagon officials appear not to have responded to the survey until this May, after Congressional investigators had begun to ask questions. Then they argued that its findings were irrelevant to Sergeant Maseth’s electrocution.


In a memo dated May 26, 2008, a top official of the Defense Contract Management Agency stated that “there is no direct or causal connection” between the problems identified in the survey and those at the Baghdad compound where Sergeant Maseth died.

But in a sworn statement, apparently prepared for an investigation of Sergeant Maseth’s death by the Army’s Criminal Investigative Division, a Pentagon contracting official described how both military and KBR officials were aware of the growing danger from poor electrical work.

Skip to next paragraph
In the statement, Ingrid Harrison, an official with the Pentagon’s contracting management agency, disclosed that an electrical fire caused by poor wiring in a nearby building two weeks before Sergeant Maseth’s death had endangered two other soldiers.

“The soldiers were lucky because the one window that they could reach did not have bars on it, or there could have been two other fatalities,” Ms. Harrison said in the statement. She said that after Sergeant Maseth died, a more senior Pentagon contracting official in Baghdad denied knowing about the fire, but she asserted that “it was thoroughly discussed” during internal meetings.


Ms. Harrison added that KBR officials also knew of widespread electrical problems at the Radwaniya Palace Complex, near Baghdad’s airport, where Sergeant Maseth died. “KBR has been at R.P.C. for over four years and was fully aware of the safety hazards, violations and concerns regarding the soldiers’ housing,” she said in the statement. She added that the contractor “chose to ignore the known unsafe conditions.”

Ms. Harrison did not respond to a request for comment.


In another internal document written after Sergeant Maseth’s death, a senior Army officer in Baghdad warned that soldiers had to be moved immediately from several buildings because of electrical risks. In a memo asking for emergency repairs at three buildings, the official warned of a “clear and present danger,” adding, “Exposed wiring, ungrounded distribution panels and inappropriate lighting fixtures render these facilities uninhabitable and unsafe.”


The memo added that “over the course of several months, electrical fires and shorts have compounded these unsafe conditions.”


Since the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, tens of thousands of American troops have been housed in Iraqi buildings that date from the Saddam Hussein era. KBR and other contractors have been paid millions of dollars to repair and upgrade the buildings, including their electrical systems. KBR officials say they handle the maintenance for 4,000 structures and an additional 35,000 containers used as housing in the war zone.


The reports of shoddy electrical work have raised new questions about the Bush administration’s heavy reliance on contractors in Iraq, particularly because they come after other high-profile disputes involving KBR. They include accusations of overbilling, providing unsafe water to soldiers and failing to protect female employees who were sexually assaulted.


Officials say the administration contracted out so much work in Iraq that companies like KBR were simply overwhelmed by the scale of the operations. Some of the electrical work, for example, was turned over to subcontractors, some of which hired unskilled Iraqis who were paid only a few dollars a day.


Government officials responsible for contract oversight, meanwhile, were also unable to keep up, so that unsafe electrical work was not challenged by government auditors.

Several electricians who worked for KBR have said previously in interviews that they repeatedly warned KBR managers and Pentagon and military officials about unsafe electrical work. They said that supervisors had ignored their concerns or, in some cases, lacked the training to understand the problems.


The Army documents cite a number of recent safety threats. One report showed that during a four-day period in late February, soldiers at a Baghdad compound reported being shocked while taking showers in different buildings. The circumstances appear similar to those that led to Sergeant Maseth’s death.


Another entry from early March stated that an entire house used by American troops was electrically charged, making it unlivable.


Since the Pentagon reports were compiled, more episodes linked to electrical problems have occurred. In late June, for example, an electrical fire at a Marine base in Falluja destroyed 10 buildings, forcing marines there to ask for donations from home to replace their personal belongings.


On July 5, Sgt. First Class Anthony Lynn Woodham of the Arkansas National Guard died at his base in Tallil, Iraq. Initial reports blamed electrocution, but his death is being investigated because of conflicting information, according to his wife, Crystal Woodham, and a spokesman for the Arkansas National Guard.

Washington State Supreme Court narrows probable-cause grounds in pot case.

July 18th, 2008


Law-enforcement officers who smell marijuana coming from a vehicle can’t arrest all of the occupants, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.


By Leslie Anne Jones Seattle Times


Law-enforcement officers who detect the odor of marijuana from a vehicle can’t arrest all of the occupants, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday. 

In a unanimous ruling, the court determined the smell of pot isn’t enough probable cause to warrant the arrest and search of everyone inside a car. While smell alone may be reason for a vehicle search, the court determined, it doesn’t warrant handcuffing passengers without other supporting evidence. 

Defense attorneys on Thursday called it a right-to-privacy victory. Law-enforcement officers say it won’t greatly affect the way they make arrests. 

The ruling stems from a traffic stop in April 2006 in Skagit County. 

Jeremy Grande was riding in a car driven by Lacee Hurley when they were pulled over by State Patrol Trooper Brent Hanger, court documents said. Hanger stopped the car for windows too darkly tinted, he testified. 

Hanger said he smelled pot in the car, so he arrested and handcuffed Grande and Hurley, court documents said. 

A search of Grande revealed a glass pipe with marijuana in his pocket, according to court papers. Hanger searched the car and found a joint in an ashtray, which Hurley said belonged to her, court documents said. Both were charged with marijuana possession. Grande was also charged with possession of drug paraphernalia, court documents said. 

The case initially came before the Skagit County District Court, which found there was no probable cause for Grande’s arrest. But the state appealed the ruling and the county’s Superior Court reversed the order, court documents said. The case was appealed to the state Supreme Court. 

Summing up the state Supreme Court’s decision, Justice Charles W. Johnson wrote: “Our state constitution protects our individual privacy, meaning that we are free from unnecessary police intrusion into our private affairs unless a police officer can clearly associate the crime with the individual.” In the case of the Skagit County traffic stop, the court found the mere presence of the odor of marijuana was not enough probable cause to warrant the arrest of Grande. 

Attorney David Zuckerman, who brought the case before the state Supreme Court, said the problem is that arresting someone based solely on the odor of marijuana can affect innocents. 

“The smell of marijuana smoke can linger for weeks,” Zuckerman said. “You could have a perfectly innocent citizen get into a car where somebody smoked marijuana at some point … and an officer can just pull you out of a car and book you based on that.” 

Zuckerman said Grande was delighted with the decision. 

The decision doesn’t mean an officer must walk away from a vehicle that smells of pot. Trooper Hanger did have probable cause to search the car, the state Supreme Court decision said, just not to arrest Grande. 

“What this means is officers are going to have to be a little more keen in their investigative skills,” said Don Pierce, executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. 

“Normally, if you come across the odor of marijuana … there’s something else going on that helps you identify who the responsible person or persons is.” 

Thursday’s decision overturned a 1979 state Court of Appeals decision that the smell of marijuana in a car established cause to arrest passengers and driver. But that decision was made three weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court held that the search of a person must be supported by probable cause that’s specific to that person. 


Generic cialis
Phentermine buy order
How does phentermine work
Phentermine online
Soma addiction
No online prescription xanax
1 loss phentermine pill weight
Cialis levivia viagra compare
Phentermine uk suppliers
Viagra compared to levivia
Phentermine free shipping
Pfizer viagra online
Phentermine withdrawal
Does viagra work
No prescripton phentermine
Phentermine testimonials
Natural supplement for viagra
Phentermine rx
Xanax liver damage
What does phentermine look like
Xanax alcohol
Cheap phentermine online 37 5
Phentermine without prescription and energy pill
Natural alternatives to viagra
Taking phentermine
Canada cialis
Online phentermine
Buy viagra uk
Xanax withdrawal
Phentermine no prescription required
Purchase soma
Herbal viagra uk
Phentermine information
Viagra substitutes
Linkdomain buy online viagra info domain buy onlin
Buy cod pay phentermine
Soma financial
Viagra tablets
Phentermine interactions
Canada cheap viagra
Any drug interaction xanax and cold meds
Viagra wholesale
Low dose of viagra
Buy tramadol
Diet online phentermine pill purchase
Tramadol pharmacy
Tramadol addiction
Herbal viagra alternative review
Cheapest phentermine 90 day orders
Viagra substitute
Mixing viagra and cialis
Prescription for viagra
Time released phentermine
Cialis viagra
Discount fioricet
Phentermine 37 5mg
Xanax drug tests
Phentermine free online consultation
Cialis day next
Viagra testimony
Natural alternative viagra
Online xanax prescription
Viagra free consultation
Free generic viagra samples
Generic vicodin
Viagra dose
Generic soma
Effects long side term xanax
Viagra pharmacy
Buy link onlinezwapto viagra
Cheap tramadol prescriptions online
Phentermine addiction
Generic viagra cialis
Non prescription xanax
Prescription soma
Phentermine 37.5 mg no prescription
Cialis drug prescription
Cheapest viagra prices
Cheapest price phentermine online pharmacy
Ambien on line
Lowest price for phentermine
Akane soma
Cheap phentermine no prescription
Delivered phentermine
Vicodin hp
Ssri phentermine heart
Killer pain tramadol
Prescription free viagra
Phentermine usa
Cheapest diet phentermine pill
Lowest cost phentermine guarantee free shipping
Effects of long term xanax use
Cod tramadol
Phentermine without perscription
Natural phentermine
Picture of xanax
Compare levivia and viagra
Phentermine sales online
Dont buy on black market get viagra legally
Tramadol abuse
Buy cheap cialis
Cheap xanax
Free shipping cheap phentermine
Viagra 6 free samples
Death cases from taking phentermine
Levitra vs cialis
Phentermine blue
Phentermine blogging
Purchase tramadol
Buy xanax without a prescription
Viagra alternative and woman
Viagra levivia
Buy cheap domain online outdoors com xanax
Cialis prescriptions
Generic viagra from india
Phentermine online no prescription
Hydrocodone mexican pharmacy what is tramadol
Prescriptions on line phentermine
Fioricet addiction
Shipping phentermine to florida
Xanax 2mg generic alprazolam 180 pills
Medication drug mylan online search phentermine diet
Order cialis uk
Phentermine review
Cheap phentermine cod
Discount viagra
Cialis levitra viagra vs vs
Phentermine buy best
What does xanax do
Phentermine 30 mg ordered with discover card
Buy online prescription viagra without
Viagra sex
Phentermine 30 mg
Adderall skin allegra skin xanax skin
Generic xanax xr
Diet pill addiction phentermine
Tramadol drug interaction
Buy generic online phentermine
Phentermine weight loss pills
Cash on delivery shipping of phentermine
Viagra samples free
Buying xanax online
Compare cialis levitra
Phentermine online without prescription
Phentermine purchase
Grapefruit xanax
Viagra cheap prescription
Phentermine overnight shipping
Buy viagra
Xanax abuse
Buy viagra order viagra
Phentermine ephedrine
Phentermine adipex diet pill prescription
Pictures of xanax bars
Diet pill xanax
120 tramadol
Phentermine 37.5 in round white tablets no imprint code
Buy hydrocodone
Cialis forums
Viagra commercial
Natural viagra alternatives
Phentermine online cod
Viagra prices
Generic viagra reviews
Cheaper viagra levivia cyalis
On line prescription viagra
Phentermine sales
Cialis and pomegranate interaction
Phentermine 37.5 free shipping
Cialis generic viagra
Picture of generic xanax
Xanax info
Buy phentermine in the uk
Generic price viagra
Phentermine lowest price 37.5 online
Buy generic xanax
Buy viagra 1
Buy soma online
Lethal dose xanax
Buying tramadol online
Phentermine sale
Does phentermine work
Hydrocodone overnight
Phentermine no rx
Bulk phentermine
Oxycodone vs hydrocodone
Discount drug phentermine
Symptom tramadol withdrawal
Method of payment accepted cod phentermine
Viagra from canada
Viagra info
Buy vicodin online
Generic viagra fast shipping
Berman sister female viagra study
$50.00 phentermine
Phentermine resin
Cheap tramadol 180
Viagra cialis comparison
Price viagra viacreme
Prescription phentermine with cod payment
Hydrocodone cough
Phentermine without doctor’s approval
Xanax overnight shipping

Fen Phen Prosecutor says Government may seek additional indictment against Cunningham and Gallion

July 17th, 2008

July 17, 2008

Assistant U.S. Attorney Laura Voorhees told Federal Judge Danny Reeves that prosecutors may seek a new indictment — commonly called a superseding indictment — that could contain new charges against the two men.  After the hearing Wednesday, Voorhees declined to say what those charges may be or whether the federal government will offer new evidence at a second trial. 

Kentucky Commission on Human Rights July Rulings

July 17th, 2008

July 17, 2008
LOUISVILLE – The Kentucky Commission on Human Rights Board of Commissioners at a quasi-judicial session today ordered Arnold and Sandy Baize d/b/a Bluegrass Café in Beaver Dam, Ky., to cease and desist from unlawful discrimination and to pay $5,000 in damages to a former employee for firing her in August 2005 because she was pregnant.  
Sunnye Arnold made a complaint against the Baizes, alleging discrimination in violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act [KRS 344], which makes it unlawful for an employer to discharge any individual because of that individual’s sex, including an individual’s pregnancy or any related medical condition.
Hearing Officer Deborah Kent said in her recommended order to the commission that the complainant proved the respondents discriminated against her based on her sex, causing her humiliation and embarrassment.
The board ruled to accept one conciliation agreement to settle a discrimination complaint. In the matter of the Lexington Fair Housing Council v. Ronnie Taylor in Glasgow, Ky., the complainant alleged the respondent placed an advertisement that said, “No Children.” The Kentucky Civil Rights Act and the U.S. Fair Housing Act prohibit real estate advertising that discriminates based on familial status against people who have children under the age of 18 living in the household. The respondent apologized for not knowing the law and agreed to donate $500 to Kosair Children’s Hospital in Louisville.
The commission dismissed 32 cases with findings of no probable cause, accepted 13 withdrawals with private, undisclosed settlements, and accepted five withdrawals without settlements but with the right to file private suits.
In other business, the commission passed a resolution to honor the recently deceased Rev. Louis Coleman Jr. of Louisville and his contributions to civil rights. “Reverend Coleman dedicated himself for over three decades in service of a higher vision of a Kentucky built on foundations of true equality,” said John J. Johnson, executive director of the commission.
The commission passed a resolution to support the 2010 U.S. Census and to encourage all people to participate in the survey. “Census data helps determine the placement of more than $300 billion a year in federal and state funding,” said Commission Chair Henry Curtis. “Census information also serves as a basis for determining legislative representation,” he said.  
The Kentucky Commission on Human Rights is the state government agency that enforces the Kentucky Civil Rights Act and the policies of federal civil rights laws. The Kentucky Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the bases of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age and disability in the jurisdictions of employment, public accommodations, housing and financial transactions. Tobacco-smoking status is an additional protected class in the jurisdiction of employment.

Ways to Protect Judges from Political Influence – Ky. could benefit from this study.

July 17th, 2008

Bob Egelko,  San Francisco Chronicle , July 16, 2008

Two former California governors who once said judges who issue objectionable rulings should lose their jobs have offered suggestions to a state commission on how to protect the judiciary from politics.


Ex-Gov. Pete Wilson says the state Constitution should be amended to help judicial candidates fend off political questionnaires. His successor as governor, Gray Davis, suggested a law that would give voters more information about candidates for trial courts.

Both stressed the need for judicial independence – Wilson disparaged “those who would seek to make political hay (by) criticizing the judiciary,” while Davis said partisan forces pose an imminent danger to the courts.


Wilson, the state’s Republican governor from 1991 to 1999, and Davis, a Democrat who governed from 1999 until his recall in November 2003, both testified Monday at a Sacramento hearing of the Commission for Impartial Courts.


Both said in interviews afterward that they had little recollection of past comments that seemingly pulled in the opposite direction from their current endorsements of judicial independence – Wilson’s statement that then-Chief Justice Rose Bird should be recalled if her court overturned a 1982 crime initiative, and Davis’ observation that his judicial appointees should resign if they didn’t go along with his views on issues such as the death penalty.


Chief Justice Ronald George established the courts commission last year to recommend changes in state laws on judicial appointments and elections, saying he was concerned that recent multimillion-dollar campaigns for control of courts in other states would spread to California.


California’s judges have largely stayed out of the political spotlight since 1986, when Bird and two state Supreme Court colleagues were removed from office in a campaign that focused on their votes to overturn death sentences.


But the role of the judiciary will be an issue in this year’s battle over a Nov. 4 initiative, Proposition 8, that would amend the California Constitution to overturn the state Supreme Court’s May 15 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage. Jennifer Kerns, spokeswoman for the Prop. 8 campaign, said Tuesday that one of its themes will be that “activist judges … brazenly overruled the will of the people.”


George, who wrote the ruling, and Justice Carlos Moreno, who was part of the 4-3 majority, are scheduled to be on the 2010 ballot seeking new 12-year terms.

At Monday’s session, several witnesses said political pressure on courts around the nation has grown since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that states can’t prohibit judicial candidates from discussing issues that they might later consider as judges. Would-be judges now regularly receive questionnaires from interest groups seeking their views on such issues as abortion and same-sex marriage, Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer told the California commission.


Saying such inquiries endanger the courts’ neutrality, Wilson suggested a state constitutional amendment that would urge judicial candidates in California not to answer political questions and that would require all questionnaires to include that advice.

Davis said one way politics creeps into the courts is in Superior Court elections, where voters typically “don’t have a clue” about the candidates. One remedy, he said, is for the State Bar commission that now does background checks of a governor’s potential court nominees, and presents confidential evaluations to the governor, to conduct the same review for all judicial candidates and make the assessments public.


Both ex-governors were interviewed afterward about their past statements on judges and politics. Wilson said he remembers criticizing Bird in 1982 – during his successful U.S. Senate campaign against Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, who had appointed the chief justice – but doesn’t recollect urging her recall.


News accounts at the time, however, quoted Wilson, then the mayor of San Diego, as saying he would support a recall if Bird’s court struck down a prosecution-backed crime initiative that voters had approved earlier in the year. Such a ruling would be “flaunting the public will,” he said.


The State Bar’s Conference of Delegates passed a resolution in September 1982 condemning Wilson’s remarks as an attack on judicial independence. The court later upheld the initiative’s key provision, with Bird among the dissenters.


Davis was quoted in February 2000 as saying his judicial appointees should reflect the positions that helped him get elected, such as support for capital punishment and abortion rights. Judges he appointed “are not out there to be independent agents,” he said, and those who reached views that opposed his positions should leave the bench.

That wasn’t what he really meant, Davis said Monday. He said his point was that he tried to screen judicial candidates carefully and choose those who shared his positions.


“Every governor hopes his appointees are more or less in sync with his governing philosophy,” Davis said. “Once they’re appointed, they’re free agents, obliged to follow the Constitution and the law.”

BlueGrass Report is back. Launches Blustery Attack on Sen. David Williams.

July 17th, 2008

It’s back!  BlueGrass Report  after a six month hiatus is back doing what it does, spreading the word for the Democratic Party.  Mark Nickolas has announced that:

“Hopkinsville’s own Walter Hawkins will be joining me on BGR and will become the lead voice on politics in the Commonwealth, while I take a back seat and focus on the federal races and national issues:

For those of you that don’t know Walter, he’s currently a practicing lawyer in Bowling Green, a graduate of UofL and NKU’s Chase School of Law. He’s also very active in Democratic Party politics, is a political consultant, and hosts his radio show on WKCT 930 AM in Bowling Green called Middle Ground.”

In their first lead story, they reported that the wife of Senate President David Williams is a registered agent for service of process for a company that benefits from road contracts issued by the state.  Robyn Williams is a District Court Judge.  There is nothing unethical or illegal about a District Judge serving as an Agent for Service of Process or in running a business, or in owning stock in a corporation that does business with the state.  Judges are permitted to have business interests as long as they don’t interfere with their work as a Judge.  We haven’t seen many highway contract cases being sent to District Court.

The story reports a premise that Sen. Williams is seeking to control highway contracts in order to benefit his wife and her family members who own stock in a company that benefits from road building, and thereby “line the pockets of Sen. Williams”.  Frankly, we do not see a smoking gun.

While the report presents a record that shows Ms. Williams is an agent for service of process for a company, which they say owns stock in another company which builds roads, does not present proof that Judge Williams owns any stock in either company, or that Sen. Williams profits financially from any contracts awarded to either company.  Further, we fail to see the “corruption” in a member of the Legislature actively supporting the building of roads.

Bluegrass Report has posted a list of topics that it will explore in the coming months.  It’s main targets will be Sen. Williams and Mitch McConnell.

Unbelievable!! Cell phone microwaves can pop popcorn – What are they doing to our brain cells?

July 17th, 2008

This demonstration may scare you.  It also explains why people shouldn’t talk on their cell phone when driving.  When will the lawsuits begin?

U.S. Justice Department Looking for Assistant Prosecutor to locate in London, Ky.

July 17th, 2008






About the Office: The United States Attorney’s Office or the Eastern District of Kentucky is a very progressive District comprised of 39 attorneys located within our three staffed offices. Our main office is located in Lexington, Kentucky, with smaller staffed branch offices located in Fort Mitchell and London, Kentucky. The communities served by our District are filled with wonderful people and our office is committed to working with local, state and federal law enforcement to ensure their safety.
Responsibilities and Opportunity Offered: Being a part of the Department of Justice is a great honor and employment in the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office offers a unique and challenging experience for the highly motivated attorney by working on some of the most significant, complex and visible cases being litigated today. Assistant United States Attorneys assigned to the Criminal Division are part of a dedicated team helping to enforce Federal criminal laws that protect life, liberty and property of our citizens. Some of the assignments include the investigation and prosecution of violent offenses, gang crimes, drug trafficking, crimes against children, public corruption, terrorism, white collar, and organized crime. The AUSA will be primarily assigned cases involving the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases.
Qualifications: Applicants must possess a J.D. degree, be an active member of the bar, and have at least one year post-J.D. experience. If not a member of the Kentucky Bar, one must become a member of the Kentucky Bar within a reasonable period of time. Successful candidates should possess superior oral and written communication skills, as well as strong character and interpersonal skills, and have demonstrated the capacity to function with minimal guidance in a highly demanding environment. Successful candidates must also possess the knowledge and ability to use computers and computer applications in performing day-to-day work requirements, including the knowledge and ability to effectively use automated litigation support to acquire, organize, analyze and present evidence, create databases and manage documents.
Travel: The AUSA will be required to travel throughout the Eastern District of Kentucky to attend court proceedings, interview witnesses, take depositions and attend meetings. Travel is also required for training at the Department of Justice’s National Advocacy Center, Columbia, South Carolina. Travel to other domestic destinations is possible.
Salary Information: Assistant United States Attorneys’ pay is administratively determined based, in part, on the number of years of professional attorney experience. Based on budget constraints, the entry base salary range for this position (based on 0-7 years experience) is $42,684 to $66,230 plus locality pay (currently 13.18% for London).
Location: London, Kentucky
Relocation Expenses: Relocation expenses will not be authorized.
Application Process: Resumes may be transmitted using mail, email, or facsimile and must be received by July 22, 2008. Mail or deliver your application to:

James A. Zerhusen
Acting United States Attorney
260 W. Vine Street, Suite 300
Lexington, KY 40507-1612
Attn: Louanne Davis, Human Resources Officer
OR e-mail your application to; OR fax your application to 859-233-2498.
Please reference announcement #08-EDKY-AUSA-04 on your resume and provide an email address if available. No telephone calls please.
Please visit the Eastern District of Kentucky website at for information on when a selection has been made.
Internet Sites: Eastern District of Kentucky –
This and other attorney vacancy announcements can be found at:
Department Policies: Assistant United States Attorneys generally must reside in the district to which he or she is appointed. See 28 U.S.C. § 545 for district-specific information.
The U.S. Department of Justice is an Equal Opportunity/Reasonable Accommodation Employer. Except where otherwise provided by law, there will be no discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, color, race, religion, national origin, politics, marital status, disability, age, status as a parent, membership or nonmembership in an employee organization, or personal favoritism. The Department of Justice welcomes and encourages applications from persons with physical and mental disabilities. The Department is firmly committed to satisfying its affirmative obligations under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to ensure that persons with disabilities have every opportunity to be hired and advanced on the basis of merit within the Department of Justice. This agency provides reasonable accommodation to applicants with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation for any part of the application and hiring process, please notify the agency. Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
It is the policy of the Department to achieve a drug-free workplace and persons selected for employment will be required to pass a drug test which screens for illegal drug use prior to final appointment. Employment is also contingent upon the completion and satisfactory adjudication of a background investigation. Only U.S. citizens are eligible for employment with the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the United States Attorneys’ Offices. Unless otherwise indicated in a particular job advertisement, non-U.S. citizens may apply for employment with other organizations, but should be advised that appointments of non-U.S. citizens are extremely rare; such appointments would be possible only if necessary to accomplish the Department’s mission and would be subject to strict security requirements. Applicants who hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and another country will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
There is no formal rating system for applying veterans’ preference to attorney appointments in the excepted service; however, the Department of Justice considers veterans’ preference eligibility as a positive factor in attorney hiring. Applicants eligible for veterans’ preference are encouraged to include that information in their cover letter or resume and attach supporting documentation (e.g., the DD 214 or other substantiating documents) to their submissions

Former Bush UN representative calls for U.S. assistance to Israel to take out Iran’s Nuclear Capability

July 17th, 2008


Israel, Iran and the Bomb


By JOHN R. BOLTON   Wall Street Journal - July 15, 2008 
Iran’s test salvo of ballistic missiles last week together with recent threatening rhetoric by commanders of the Islamic Republic’s Revolutionary Guards emphasizes how close the Middle East is to a fundamental, in fact an irreversible, turning point.

Tehran’s efforts to intimidate the United States and Israel from using military force against its nuclear program, combined with yet another diplomatic charm offensive with the Europeans, are two sides of the same policy coin. The regime is buying the short additional period of time it needs to produce deliverable nuclear weapons, the strategic objective it has been pursuing clandestinely for 20 years.

Between Iran and its long-sought objective, however, a shadow may fall: targeted military action, either Israeli or American. Yes, Iran cannot deliver a nuclear weapon on target today, and perhaps not for several years. Estimates vary widely, and no one knows for sure when it will have a deliverable weapon except the mullahs, and they’re not telling. But that is not the key date. Rather, the crucial turning point is when Iran masters all the capabilities to weaponize without further external possibility of stopping it. Then the decision to weaponize, and its timing, is Tehran’s alone. We do not know if Iran is at this point, or very near to it. All we do know is that, after five years of failed diplomacy by the EU-3 (Britain, France and Germany), Iran is simply five years closer to nuclear weapons.

And yet, true to form, State Department comments to Congress last week – even as Iran’s missiles were ascending – downplayed Iran’s nuclear progress, ignoring the cost of failed diplomacy. But the confident assumption that we have years to deal with the problem is high-stakes gambling on a policy that cannot be reversed if it fails. If Iran reaches weaponization before State’s jaunty prediction, the Middle East, and indeed global, balance of power changes in potentially catastrophic ways.

And consider what comes next for the U.S.: the Bush administration’s last six months pursuing its limp diplomatic efforts, plus six months of a new president getting his national security team and policies together. In other words, one more year for Tehran to proceed unhindered to “the point of no return.”

We have almost certainly lost the race between giving “strong incentives” for Iran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons, and its scientific and technological efforts to do just that. Swift, sweeping, effectively enforced sanctions might have made a difference five years ago. No longer. Existing sanctions have doubtless caused some pain, but Iran’s real economic woes stem from nearly 30 years of mismanagement by the Islamic Revolution.

More sanctions today (even assuming, heroically, support from Russia and China) will simply be too little, too late. While regime change in Tehran would be the preferable solution, there is almost no possibility of dislodging the mullahs in time. Had we done more in the past five years to support the discontented – the young, the non-Persian minorities and the economically disaffected – things might be different. Regime change, however, cannot be turned on and off like a light switch, although the difficulty of effecting it is no excuse not to do more now.

That is why Israel is now at an urgent decision point: whether to use targeted military force to break Iran’s indigenous control over the nuclear fuel cycle at one or more critical points. If successful, such highly risky and deeply unattractive air strikes or sabotage will not resolve the Iranian nuclear crisis. But they have the potential to buy considerable time, thereby putting that critical asset back on our side of the ledger rather than on Iran’s.

With whatever time is bought, we may be able to effect regime change in Tehran, or at least get the process underway. The alternative is Iran with nuclear weapons, the most deeply unattractive alternative of all.

But the urgency of the situation has not impressed Barack Obama or the EU-3. Remarkably, on July 9, Sen. Obama, as if stumbling on a new idea, said Iran “must suffer threats of economic sanctions” and that we needed “direct diplomacy . . . so we avoid provocation” and “give strong incentives . . . to change their behavior.” Javier Solana, chief EU negotiator, was at the time busy fixing a meeting with the Iranians to continue five years of doing exactly what Mr. Obama was proclaiming, without results.

John McCain responded to Iran’s missile salvo by stressing again the need for a workable missile defense system to defend the U.S. against attacks by rogue states like Iran and North Korea. He is undoubtedly correct, highlighting yet another reason why November’s election is so critical, given the unceasing complaints about missile defense from most Democrats.

Important as missile defense is, however, it is only a component of a postfailure policy on Iran’s nuclear-weapons capacity. In whatever limited amount of time before then, we must face a very hard issue: What will the U.S. do if Israel decides to initiate military action? There was a time when the Bush administration might itself have seriously considered using force, but all public signs are that such a moment has passed.

Israel sees clearly what the next 12 months will bring, which is why ongoing U.S.-Israeli consultations could be dispositive. Israel told the Bush administration it would destroy North Korea’s reactor in Syria in spring, 2007, and said it would not wait past summer’s end to take action. And take action it did, seeing a Syrian nuclear capability, for all practical purposes Iran’s agent on its northern border, as an existential threat. When the real source of the threat, not just a surrogate, nears the capacity for nuclear Holocaust, can anyone seriously doubt Israel’s propensities, whatever the impact on gasoline prices?

Thus, instead of debating how much longer to continue five years of failed diplomacy, we should be intensively considering what cooperation the U.S. will extend to Israel before, during and after a strike on Iran. We will be blamed for the strike anyway, and certainly feel whatever negative consequences result, so there is compelling logic to make it as successful as possible. At a minimum, we should place no obstacles in Israel’s path, and facilitate its efforts where we can.

These subjects are decidedly unpleasant. A nuclear Iran is more so.

Mr. Bolton, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, is the author of “Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations” (Simon & Schuster, 2007).

Pro Bono Attorney in Divorce case can seek fee from opposing party.

July 17th, 2008

“A lawyer’s duty to represent the interests and wishes of his client comes ahead of his entitlement to a fee.” This bell has a beautiful ring when tolled to announce the commencement of church services, but it is a clanging noise in the corridors of divorce court. – Justice Leibson
In this decision Justice Leibson in a concurring opinion opines that an attorney who takes a divorce case on a pro bono basis is entitled to seek payment for the opposing party if they have financial resources.   This ruling by Stephens, Gant, Lambert and Leibson overruled prior law.

Hale v. Hale, 772 S.W.2d 628 (Ky., 1989)
“In our view, K.R.S. 403.220, which authorizes the court in certain divorce cases to order one party to pay a reasonable amount for attorney’s fees of the other party, is broad enough to authorize the payment of a fee to an attorney who has accepted representation of an indigent client under an express agreement that he would not charge his client any fee for his services.   The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
LEIBSON, J., concurs by a separate concurring opinion in which STEPHENS, C.J., and GANT and LAMBERT, JJ., join.  LEIBSON, Justice, concurring.
 To be internally consistent, this Opinion needs to address the problem created by Sullivan v. Levin, Ky., 555 S.W.2d 261 (1977). Sullivan holds that a lawyer retained by a financially disadvantaged spouse, who accepts representation in the expectation that his fee will be awarded under KRS 403.220, can no longer pursue this fee if the parties reconcile and drop the case.
 The fundamental premise in Sullivan was that a lawyer’s interest in obtaining a fee in a divorce action is only derivative, that it “does not exist for the protection of the attorney, but is strictly for the benefit of the client.” Id. at 263.
        It is this statement from Sullivan upon which the respondent/husband in the present case relied, and the Court of Appeals relied, when refusing a fee otherwise appropriate under KRS 403.220 to an attorney representing a wife “pro bono.”
        There is nothing in KRS 403.220 specifically addressing the status of a “pro bono” attorney. To the contrary, the statute is simply a statutory redefinement of the standard under which the trial court in a divorce case may address the imbalance in “the financial resources” of the parties. The range of cases to which it applies covers the destitute and the indigent, and it also covers the spouse who is neither, but simply proportionally worse off. The threshold consideration is not whether the attorney’s client can afford to pay any fee, but simply what equity requires “considering the financial resources of both parties.”

        The underlying problem is the same for the attorney representing the indigent pro bono and the attorney representing the spouse who is financially needy but not totally destitute. In both cases there is neither reason nor excuse for permitting the opposing spouse with the financial resources to pay to escape the liability which the statute imposes.
 Here we hold there is no reason to disregard KRS 403.220 simply because services will be for free if the court awards no attorney’s fee. Likewise, contrary to the holding in Sullivan, there is no reason for denying the attorney’s fee simply because the parties have reconciled and the formerly financially disadvantaged spouse, who still cannot afford to pay her attorney unless the court awards a fee, no longer wishes to see the attorney paid.
This creates a conflict of interest for the attorney between his duty to his client to promote a reconciliation and his own financial interest which will be destroyed by the reconciliation. This conflict of interest defeats both the purpose of the statute and the best interest of the public.
        The Opinion in the Sullivan case gives a second reason for denying the fee, a reason which bears no relation to the controlling statute and which will not withstand logical analysis: “A lawyer’s duty to represent the interests and wishes of his client comes ahead of his entitlement to a fee.” 555 S.W.2d at 263. This bell has a beautiful ring when tolled to announce the commencement of church services, but it is a clanging noise in the corridors of divorce court. It causes the financially disadvantaged spouse to be denied access to competent counsel who hesitate to accept employment knowing they will receive no fee in the event of reconciliation.   The decision in this case cuts the ground out from under Sullivan v. Levin. We overrule it.”

Judge Danny Reeves to Move Fen Phen Retrial to Frankfort

July 17th, 2008

July 17, 2008

U.S. District Judge Reeves, whose office is in Frankfort, said he wants to move the retrial of Shirley Cunningham Jr. and William Gallion because the lack of pretrial publicity in Frankfort would make it easier to seat a jury. 

He also said Frankfort is closer to where many of the witnesses live, and will not be an added burden to the two lead defense lawyers because  they already are traveling from out of state.

The trial, which under the Speedy Trial Act, must begin within 70 days of the mistrial, could begin at any time before Oct. l4th.  However, if the Government seeks additional indictments the trial date could be pushed back to as late as February or later.

There is no indication that additional indictments will be sought, but the Government has the option to try to find more charges to supplement the one count upon which the defendants were tried in Covington.  Considering that the original jury was 10-2 for acquittal on the original charges, the new prosecution team may seek to enhance their options by throwing everything but the kitchen sink at the defendants.

Testimony at the original trial indicated that the attorneys were entitled to fees of about $60 million, but they placed $20 million in a charitable cy pres trust (a practice that is not unusual and in fact is recommended by several Federal decisions) and by paying consultants and court costs of approximately $45 million.

The original jury may have been influenced by the fact that the two defendants did not receive the $60 million that went into the charitable trust and to pay the consultants. 

The “victims” who received $75 million dollars in their settlement are seeking additional sums and if successful will establish the principal that plaintiffs are not liable for court costs and fees. 

The $60 million dollars actually retained by the defendants as attorney fees is about 30% of the total settlement. 


At $1500, Kentucky Small Claims Court has the lowest Dollar Jurisdictional Amount in the United States…its time for a change.

July 16th, 2008

Editorial by LawReader Senior Editor Stan Billingsley     July 16, 2008 

One of the best features of the l976 Judicial Amendment to the Kentucky Constitution was the creation of the Small Claims Court.  This court has proven very popular with businesses and consumers. 

At $1,500, Kentucky has the lowest dollar jurisdiction limit for Small Claims Court in the United States.  Delaware, Georgia and Tennessee have the highest dollar jurisdiction at $15,000.  (The Dollar limit in Tennessee is $15,000 except in Shelby and Anderson Counties where the limit is $25,000.) 

The national average dollar jurisdiction of Small Claims Courts is $5750.  Thirty-one states have a dollar limit of $5000 or more.  (See the statistics at the bottom of this article.)Since the $1,500 dollar jurisdiction limit was created in l976, the salary of the District Judge has increased 370%.   We believe it is time to likewise increase the Small Claims jurisdictional limit to $5000.  This would also require an increase in the District Court dollar jurisdictional limit (which is now only $4000) to a sum which should be closer to $10,000. 

Such a change would provide the public with faster and cheaper access to the courts. 

The Small Claims court is set up to allow small civil claims to be brought to court without the necessity of the party having to hire an attorney.   Before this court was created, most small claims were just forgotten and the consumer or the business just ate their loss, because the complexity of the court system meant that a party had to hire a lawyer.   By and large lawyers applauded the Small Claims Court because they couldn’t afford to take these cases for a reasonable fee. 

Under the Small Claims system a layman can go to the court house fill out a simple form, and file a civil lawsuit as long as it doesn’t exceed the dollar jurisdictional limit of $1500.  If it is more than that but less than $4000, then a claim can be filed in the District Court, but this subjects the plaintiff to civil court procedures that can be hard to navigate. 

In my many years on the District Court bench I saw inflation eat away the benefit of the Small Claims court.  This was and continues to be evidenced by many claimants who have claims in excess of $1500 to reduce the amount they seek to recover by filing in Small Claims Court but limiting their claim to the maximum of $1500.  I have seen claims of $3000 to $4000 reduced to $1500 so the plaintiff could file in Small Claims Court and avoid having to hire an attorney, and subject themselves to the Rules of Discovery and other procedures that can drive up court costs. 

The public has told us by their use of Small Claims court and by reducing their claims to fit within the jurisdictional limits that the Kentucky limit of $1500 is outdated, is too small, and no longer serves the public. 

Fifteen years ago or so, I wrote a Handbook for Small Claims Court.  In that book we called for an increase in the dollar jurisdiction to the Small Claims Court.  The biggest opponents of the increase at that time was my fellow judges on the District Bench.  They frankly told me they didn’t want the extra work. 

The dollar jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court is set by KRS 24A.230, and could easily be amended by the Legislature.  The $4000 limit for District Court is set by KRS 24A.120 

The dollar jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is set by KRS 23A.010 which says that all cases not assigned to other courts will be heard in Circuit Court.  So a change in the two statutes related to the District Court would automatically change the dollar jurisdiction of the Circuit Court. 

So only two statutes would have to be amended to accomplish this needed reform. 

We don’t believe the members of the Judiciary should stand in the way of a reform that will serve the public. 

If you have an opinion about this, please discuss it with your legislators.

Alabama – Small Claims Forms

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Alabama $3,000

Alaska Small Claims Handbook (Forms Committee, Alaska Supreme Court, February 2004). See also small claims forms online.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Alaska $10,000

Arizona’s Small Claims Divisions – A Guide to the Operations of Small Claims Divisions in Justice of the Peace Courts

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Arizona $2,500

Small Claims Court in Arkansas – FAQ and sample forms.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Arkansas $5,000

District courts, formerly known as municipal courts before passage of
Amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution, exercise county-wide jurisdiction over misdemeanor cases, preliminary felony cases, and civil cases in matters of less than $5,000. A small claims division of district court provides a forum in which citizens represent themselves to resolve minor civil matters. The city courts operate in smaller communities where district courts do not exist and exercise city-wide jurisdiction.

California courts offer extensive self-help resources, many of which are targeted at an audience of small claims litigants. Moreover, many counties have a small claims advisor, who provides consultation via telephone. Below is a listing of general statewide resources, as well as links to individual superior court small claims divisions by county. EZLegalFile is an interactive site that helps litigants fill out the necessary forms.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit California $7,500

Self-Help Center: Small Claims. Guide to procedures, mediation, collection, links, forms, etc.

California Department of Consumer Affairs

Amador County Superior Court, Small Claims Division – introduction, how to file, jurisdiction, court clerk’s role, what to expect, links, and information for defendants.

Calaveras County Superior Court, Small Claims Information – click on “small claims” on the menu to the left. Contacts, self-help, forms.

Contra Costa Superior Court, Small Claims Court – general information, contacts, how to obtain forms.

Fresno Small Claims information – contacts, resources, lawyer and mediation referral, forms, etc. from the statewide Self-Help Center.

Glenn County Small Claims Information – overview, how to file a claim, monetary limits, small claims advisor, court clerk’s role, links to self-help sites, what to expect, information for defendants, FAQ.

Humboldt County Small Claims Advisory Services – contacts, lawyer referral, law library.

Inyo Superior Court, Small Claims Division – overview, filing a claim, hearings, information for defendants and plaintiffs, monetary limits, court clerk’s role, what to expect, contacts.

Kern County Superior Court, Small Claims – introduction, interpreter information, special accommodations, night court, filing a claim, fees, forms, legal advice, resources.

Lake County Small Claims Information – hours, contacts, links.

Los Angeles County Superior Court, Small Claims overview, filing, rules, contact for small claims court advisor.

Marin County Superior Court, Small Claims – link to EZFile, how to subpoena a witness, appeals, naming a defendant, changing a court date, changing or amending claims, FAQ about appeals, contacts, hours.

Mendocino County Superior Court, Small Claims – clerk information, forms and filing, fees, assistance, calendar, local rules, contacts, hours.

Modoc County Superior Court, Small Claims Court – basic information about case types, contacts, location, etc.

Mono County Superior Court, Small Claims – process, advisor, EZLegal File link.

Napa Small Claims Court – jurisdictional amounts; contact information; procedure; links; service of process.

Nevada County Superior Court Small Claims Information – requirements, fees, procedures, fictitious business name instructions, suing a business or corporation, suing government agencies, attorney-client fee disputes, methods of service, suing multiple defendants, how to request a continuance, list of things to consider before filing or defending a suit.

Orange County Superior Court Small Claims Information – jurisdiction, contacts, links to resources.

Placer County Superior Court, Civil and Small Claims – introduction, contacts, filing information, service of process, resources.

Plumas County Small Claims information – hours, advisor contact, mediation, law library, court website.

Riverside County Small Claims information – forms, contacts, overview, advisor contact.

Sacramento County Superior Court, Small Claims – process, location and hours, mediation, e-filing, Sacramento Small Claims Advisory Clinic, links, exhibits.

San Benito County Small Claims information – hours, contacts, website.

San Bernardino County Small Claims information – contacts, hours, advisors, law library.

San Diego Superior Court, Small Claims Court – overview, filing a claim, rules, service of process, enforcement, fees. Advisor, post-judgment proceedings, sheriffs fees.

San Francisco Superior Court, Small Claims Division – contacts, jurisdiction, forms, interpreter information, advisor contact, links.

San Joaquin County Superior Court, Small Claims – overview, filing, rules, fee waiver information, advisor, e-filing, resources, post-judgment information.

San Mateo County Superior Court, Small Claims – allows parties to complete forms online. Also includes local forms, information, mediation, how to prepare claim, how to file, how to serve, how to change a date, how to appeal, collection, advisory workshops, glossary, and other resources.

Santa Clara Superior Court, Small Claims – fees, self-service, case info, links to state resources.

Stanislaus County Superior Court, Small Claims – overview, statutes, basic procedure, fee schedule, state resources.

Yolo County Superior Court, Small Claims – contact, location, FAQ, handbook, fees, and forms.

State Small Claims Page – includes forms, FAQ, Handbook, and Small Claims Rules of Procedure

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Colorado $7,500

In Connecticut, small claims court is part of the Civil Division of the Superior Court.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Connecticut $5,000

Small Claims – FAQ

In Delaware, the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas includes civil cases with amounts in controversy less than $50,000.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Delaware $15,000


[top]District of Columbia
DC Superior Court – contains location, hours, contacts, jurisdiction, FAQ.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit District of Columbia $5,000

Florida State Courts – Florida State Courts

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Florida $5,000

Alachua County (Eighth Circuit): Small claims court information includes overview, definitions of legal terms, procedure, how to fill out forms, mediation information, collection, and help on how to use the pro se site.

Brevard County small claims forms.

Broward County: Civil Department (Circuit and County) FAQ includes small claims information.

Charlotte County: Summary Claims information includes jurisdiction, documents that litigants must bring to court, contacts.

Citrus County: forms. (Click on “courts” and “small claims.”)

Clay County: small claims overview, evaluating a claim; filing, procedures.

Collier County: small claims FAQ, online calculator.

Escambia County: Small claims commonly asked questions. (Use the “jump to” dropdown menu and select “Small claims?”)

Flagler County: Small claims procedures, jurisdiction, collections, filing, etc. (Mouse over “Department Info,” then select “Civil Court,” then select “Small Claims.”)

Gilchrist County: Information about small claims procedures (click on “County Civil Department.”)

Hernando County: County Civil Department. Includes jurisdiction, hours, contact, worksheet, statement of responsibility, statement of claim.

Hillsborough County: County Civil Department site offers overview, forms, contact information.

Lake County: Small claims FAQ, fees, office location and phone number, handbook, “how-to” for various steps in the procedure of a small claims case.

Lee County: Small claims forms.

Levy County: Small claims court information includes jurisdiction/overview, when and where to file, pretrial hearing, trial, how to collect a judgment, worksheet, and FAQ.

Manatee County: Small claims information includes forms, fees, overview, and contacts.

Marion County: Summary claims (small claims) page includes information about filing, service, pretrial, mediation, judgments, and settlement.

Martin County: Small claims page includes information about filing fees, court costs, how to file, FAQ about procedures, and links to forms.

Miami-Dade: Small claims court information includes overview/jurisdiction, telephone numbers, and procedure.

Monroe County: Small claims FAQ, contacts.

Okaloosa County: Small claims FAQ includes schedule of service charges and information about mediation, as well as basic procedure in a small claims case.

Osceola County: Small claims information includes FAQ (click on “Small/Summary Claims”).

Palm Beach County: Small claims information includes filing fees, overview, locations, hours, etc. (click on “Small Claims” under “Other Pages” in the left-hand menu).

Pasco County: Small claims information includes overview/jurisdiction, the role of the clerk, requirements to file, all necessary forms and documents, filing fees, costs, how to pay fees and costs, how to collect a judgment, contacts, and directions.

Pinellas County: Small claims information includes FAQ on procedure, how to collect a judgment, schedule of fees, and contacts.

Polk County: Small Claims Court FAQ. (Click on “Common Questions” and “Small Claims Court.”)

St. John’s County: Small claims information includes downloadable guide, forms, instructions, and affidavits.

Seminole County: FAQ about civil cases includes information about small claims (scroll down to reach section).

Volusia County: Small claims page includes overview, procedure, definitions, role of the clerk, contacts, collections, forms, filing requirements, schedule of service charges, and other information. (Click on “Clerk’s Departments” and then “Small Claims” to view the page.)

Walton County: Small claims page includes jurisdiction, filing fees, location, instructions for filing, procedure, suggestions for collecting money judgments, and satisfaction of judgment. (Click on “Small Claims” in the left-hand menu.)

Small claims cases are heard in Magistrate Courts. Magistrate Court forms (although these are not all small claims) are available by county.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Georgia $15,000

Chatham County Magistrate Court: Handy guide to small claims court, including how to collect judgment, settlement, and “important things to remember.” (Click on “Small Claims Court” in the green section of the left-hand menu.)

Hawaii District Court: Small Claims Court information includes brochure, forms, and overview.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Hawaii $3,500

Small Claims in Idaho providing information, referral and standard forms for persons who are representing themselves in court.

Sixth Judicial District Court offers forms and instructions for small claims.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Idaho $4,000

Idaho State Judiciary

Gives general information about the small claims process.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Illinois $10,000

Offers forms and general information.

Gives rules on small claims court.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Indiana $6,000

Small claims manual (2005) .pdf

Offers explanation of the process.

Explanation of how small claims court works.

Explaining rules and procedures of representing yourself in small claims cases.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Iowa $5,000

Gives forms.

About Small Claims in Iowa

Explains what the small claims court does and gives forms.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Kansas $4,000

Kansas Small Claims Information

Small claims forms. Scroll to the bottom of the web page.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Kentucky $1,500

Explaining how to use the Baton Rouge Small Claims Court and answering frequently asked questions.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Louisiana $3,000 – The offical web site of the State of Louisiana

This site explains what the small claims court does, as well as provides online forms, as well as a guide to small claims court proceedings.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Maine $4,500

District Court of Maryland’s site shows how to file a claim and answers FAQs.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Maine $4,500

Guide to Small Claims Proceedings in the District Court

Explains the small claims court process and gives listing of all small claims courts in the state.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Massachusetts $2,000

District Court Department – SMALL CLAIMS INFORMATION – The small claims court is not a separate court, but a special session of the District Court, the Boston Municipal Court or the Housing Court. It is designed to provide a simple, informal and inexpensive procedure for the resolution of smaller cases ($2,000 or less). The information below is provided to assist those persons wishing to proceed in District Court.

Gives self-help explanations of small claims court process.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Michigan $3,000

Michigan – Small Claims Court

Explains procedure and offers additional resources on the topic.

Gives basic information about conciliation court (small claims).

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Minnesota $7,500

Minnesota Judicial Branch, a fully unified system of trial and appellate courts administered by the Minnesota Judicial Council.

Explains what Conciliation Court is and the fees paid in Stearns County.

Attorney General Consumer Protection Division’s users’ guide to Conciliation Courts.

Gives basic information on the state’s small claims courts.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Mississippi $2,500

Justice Court handles all civil jurisdiction up to $2,500.

Briefly explains small claims court process in Hinds County.

The Official State Web Site of MississippiState Judiciary & Local Judiciary

The Missouri Bar Young Lawyers’ Section publishes the Missouri Small Claims Handbook.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Missouri $3,000

Missouri – Small Claims Forms

Montana State Bar Association gives general information about small claims courts in the state and gives the phone number to the lawyer referral service.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Montana $3,000

Montana -Guide to Small Claims Court – Small claims court is a quick, inexpensive and informal way to resolve disputes over small amounts of personal property or money. Juries and lawyers are not necessary. Small claims cases are handled in justice courts, in accordance with Title 25, Chapter 35 of the Montana Code Annotated.

Web page providing general information on small claims courts by the Nebraska Judicial Branch.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Nebraska $2,700

Self-help website by the Nebraska Judicial Branch providing instructions and an “on-line assistant” guiding through the process. It is not designated to provide specific advice, and may not be totally applicable in any particular case. If you have additional questions about small claims court or your legal rights, you should seek the professional advice of a lawyer.

Clark County’s (including Las Vegas) website giving general information on the courts as well as FAQs and providing forms.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Nevada $5,000

This site provides detailed information on the small claims courts in Clark County, discussing filing forms and fees.

[top]New Hampshire
Gives basic information on small claims courts: why to file, where to go, what to do. This site also provides forms for consumer complaints.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit New Hampshire $5,000

New Hampshire: How to File a Small Claim/Court Procedures

[top]New Jersey
Explains what small claims can typically be filed as well as other FAQs.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit New Jersey $3,000

This is a real property tax small claims handbook providing general information both in English and Spanish.

[top]New Mexico
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court provides a brochure, “Collection of a Judgment.”

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit New Mexico $10,000

New Mexico: How to file a private lawsuit in Metro or Magistrate small claims court

[top]New York
Gives general information on small claim courts, including small and commercial claims, court fees and community outreach.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit New York $5,000 ($3,000 in town and village courts)

New York City Civil Court – Small Claims Forms

Instructions for Filing a Small Claims/Commercial Claims Action (only for non-New York City residents suing New York City residents) (CIV-SC-66)(pdf)

Statement of Claim (CIV-SC-50)(pdf)

Instructions For Filing Actions Against the City of New York, the State of New York, the United States of America


[top]North Carolina
About Small Claims Court – Small claims court is part of the District Court Division. It handles civil cases where a plaintiff requests assignment to a magistrate and the amount in controversy is $5,000 or less. The principal relief sought in small claims court is money, the recovery of specific personal property, or summary ejectment (eviction). A magistrate presides over small claims court. There is no jury and usually no lawyers. A person who loses in small claims court may appeal for a trial by jury before a judge in District Court.

For additional information see the Guide to Small Claims Court maintained under the Publications area of the Legal Aid of North Carolina Web Site

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit North Carolina $5,000

Providing basic information, including fees, amount in dispute must be $4,000 or less, as well as how to file a claim.

Gives general information on the court as well as a link to the state’s Legal Aid for more information.

[top]North Dakota
The amount in dispute must be $5,000 or less, also provides general information.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit North Dakota $5,000

This website has the forms needed to file a claim.

Brochure from the consumer protection section of the state attorney general’s office.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Ohio $3,000

Ohio Judicial Conference. “Small Claims Court: A Citizens Guide.” Columbus, OH: Ohio Judicial Conference and Ohio State Bar Foundation, 2006.

Types of cases heard in small claims court.

General information from the Oklahoma State Bar Association.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Oklahoma $6,000

Lists fees.

Explains the procedures in small claims court.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Oregon $5,000

Comprehensive site of the small claim court process in the state.

Informational pamphlet on small claims court in Philadelphia.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Pennsylvania $8,000

[top]Rhode Island
Sharing information on small claims court like the rights of plaintiff and defendant.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Rhode Island $2,500

[top]South Carolina
General information on Charleston County’s magistrate’s court.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit South Carolina $7,500

Magistrates Small Claims Court – The magistrate court in many instances functions as a Small Claims Court. In order for this court to have jurisdiction, your claim cannot exceed $7,500.00, except in disputes between landlords and tenants. Employees of the magistrate court will help you file your claim in writing and will explain to you how your case will proceed through trial. You are not required to hire an attorney unless you so desire.

[top]South Dakota
Provides basic information.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit South Dakota $8,000

Tennessee Bar Association’s general information on small claims procedure.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Tennessee $15,000 ($25,000 in Shelby and Anderson Counties)

Comprehensive FAQ of small claims court in Williamson County.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Texas $5,000

State of Texas – Justice of the Peace Courts

A small claims department of the District Court is designated to settle legal issues and problems arising from contractual or service disputes or other claims which do not exceed the sum of $7,500. A small claims court allows an individual or business to be compensated by a party who has not performed according to an agreement or who had committed some wrongdoing.

Background information and answers some questions on small claims court procedure.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Utah $7,500

Utah codes on small claims court.

Explains to the public what the small claims court does as well as giving FAQs.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Vermont $3,500

Comprehensive site on small claims court procedure.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Virginia $2,000

FAQs and brochure.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Washington $4,000

Self-help information.

[top]West Virginia
There are 158 magistrates statewide, with at least two in every county and 10 in the largest county. Magistrates issue arrest and search warrants, hear misdemeanor cases, conduct preliminary examinations in felony cases, and hear civil cases with $5,000 or less in dispute. Magistrates also issue emergency protective orders in cases involving domestic violence. The circuit courts hear appeals of magistrate court cases.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? …
Dollar limit West Virginia $5,000

West Virginia – Magistrate Courts – Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction

Provides general information on Magistrate Courts (Small Claims Courts).

Gives some background on Magistrate Courts.

Some self-help information.

Basic information on small claims courts.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Wisconsin $5,000

Small Claims court guide in Dane County.

Shares the types of cases brought to small claims courts.

Basic information as well as what can be done in the event the defendant does not pay what is awarded to the plaintiff by the judgment.

Rules governing small claims cases.

How much can I sue for in small claims court? … Dollar limit Wyoming $5,000

Wyoming Circuit Courts – The Circuit Court is a limited jurisdiction court, which operates in all 23 counties. It hears all misdemeanor criminal cases and smaller civil cases. Judges are full time and they must be lawyers.

Wyoming: Circuit Courts Directory

Xanax online without a prescription
Free shipping phentermine
37.5 phentermine
Overnight phentermine shipping
Buy xanax online
Buy cheap cialis online
Viagra discount sale
Order tramadol
Lethal dosage of xanax
Generic viagra fast shipping
Viagra canada prescription
Levitra vs cialis
Diet ky phentermine pill ship that
Xanax photos
Buy viagra online cheap
Adipex diet phentermine pill
Xanax cod
Viagra sale online
Purchase viagra on line
Yohimbe and viagra
Buy discount cialis
First viagra commercial network tv
Buy cheap purchase uk viagra
Phentermine cash on delivery accepted
Discount hydrocodone
Is it safe to take prozac and phentermine
Viagra prices
Phentermine prescription
Lisinopril versus viagra
Discount phentermine free shipping
Vitamin b12 1000 mcg phentermine and panic attacks
Herbal viagra reviews
Phentermine 37 5
Generic xanax xr
Buy viagra without a prescription
Tramadol 50 mg
Abbr href rel title title viagra
Buy get online prescription viagra
Vicodin detox
20mg cialis
Prescription for viagra
Xanax canada
Cialis online sales
Cheap viagra generic
Phentermine 90 day
Tramadol hcl acetaminotran
Medication drug mylan online search phentermine diet
Discount viagra europe
Phentermine medical insert
Female spray viagra
Pfizer viagra online
Cialis online discount
But phentermine
Ambien 10mg
Xanax in pregnancy
Cheap phentermine prescription
Free shipping with phentermine order
Impotence pill viagra
Viagra doses
Phentermine diet
Viagra patent infringement reexam
Cialis tablets
Soma muscle
Xanax 2 mg
Cheap phentermine
Tramadol without a prescription
India pharmacies ativan valium xanax
Phentermine amide
Phentermine generic
Generic viagra online
Fioricet description
Buy cialis in uk
Vicodin info
Xanax for dogs
No prescription cialis
Drug vicodin
Difference between cialis and viagra
Phentermine sameday overnight saturday delivery
Viagra drug
Diet drug fenfluramine phentermine
Cialis company
Cheap xanax no prescription
What is phentermine
Xanax side effect
Female use viagra
Phentermine use
Cheap phentermine overnight
Information on the drug xanax
Non perscription viagra
Xanax with same day delivery
Viagra like pill
Tramadol cash on delivery
Adipex phentermine prescription
Phentermine 37.5 adipex 37.5 mg
25 mg viagra
Fioricet online
Get viagra
Natural viagra substitutes
Viagra cream
Phentermine and glaucoma
Xenical hgh phentermine quit smoking detox
Buy generic xanax
Online phentermine order
Paxil with phentermine interactions
Buy cheap vicodin
Phentermine 37.5 90
Phentermine and diet pill
Buy viagra
Tramadol no prescription
Nitroglycerin and viagra
Purchase fioricet
Reliable same or next day phentermine purchase online
Uk cheapest viagra
Best price for viagra in the uk
Side effects from prozac and xanax
Dont buy on black market get viagra legally
Overnight phentermine
Xanax cash on delivery
Phentermine weight loss medication
Non prescription viagra
Phentermine success stories
Cialis new viagra
Viagra without a prescription
Free phentermine
Phentermine and blood in stool
Discount drug phentermine
Vicodin addiction
Next day phentermine
Viagra soft tabs
Free trial viagra
Cheapest place to buy phentermine
Generica viagra
Viagra in woman
Loss phentermine story success weight
Phentermine line
2 mg xanax
Cheap tramadol no prescription
Xanax dosages
Generic viagra overnight
Buy viagra now
Viagra herbal
Mexican pharmacy phentermine
No phentermine prescription
Alternative new viagra
Buy vicodin without prescription
Withdrawal from xanax
Prescription viagra written
Generic cialis
Phentermine from the uk
Viagra sex
Online pharmacy phentermine xenical meridia
Buy phentermine on line
Xanax and pregnancy
Cheap tramadol 180
Phentermine 37.5mg cheap
Generic viagra overnight delivery
Tramadol drug interactions
Mastercard phentermine
Buy tramadol without prescription
Effects of xanax
Compare viagra cialis levitra
Tramadol addiction
Viagra patent expiration
Pharmacy phentermine sister
Alternative to viagra online
1 loss phentermine pill weight
Overnight shipping phentermine
Where to buy viagra online
Detection drug in phentermine screen urine
Uk viagra suppliers
Viagra uk
Cialis viagra
Information on phentermine
Buy online phentermine shipping
Buy discount viagra online
Buy cheap phentermine free fedex
Ambien cr effects side
Tramadol pharmacy
Killer pain tramadol
Do companies sell phentermine with low dose ingredients
Oxycodone vs hydrocodone
History of phentermine use
Buy viagra internet
Cialis info
Phentermine tablets
Fill online prescription viagra
180 tramadol
Generic cialis online
Xanax paypal
Phentermine forums and chats
Grapefruit viagra

Popular Carrollton Attorney Tobi Shartzer has stroke, condition is encouraging- Bourne and Wells pitch in to help carry on his practice

July 16th, 2008

Last week Carrollton Attorney Tobi Shartzer who is about 35, had a stroke while eating lunch at a local restaurant.  We are happy to report that he is recovering nicely, is sitting up, had a Strawberry milkshake yesterday, and will be headed to the Drake Center for some rehab.  He has some problems with movement on his left side, but his condition is “encouraging”. 

Ed Bourne of Owenton, and Joe Wells of Carrollton and Bedford have pitched in to help carry Tobi’s law practice until he can return.  We all admire their willingness to help a fellow lawyer through a tough time. 

Tobi is in the University of Cincinnati hospital.  Everyone at LawReader wishes him a speedy recovery

New laws passed in 2008 become eff. July 15th. – See listing

July 14th, 2008

The 2008 Session of the Ky. General Assembly adopted 150 new laws.  Except for a few bills which became effective shortly after their passage, by emergency provision, these new laws will become effective July 15, 2008.  Listed below is a topic index of legislation adopted in the 2008 session.  This will give you a head’s up of reguarding new legislation.

An index showing which statutes were affected is found at:

The actual wording of most statutes will not be posted online or released by legal publishers until the Ky. Revisor of Statutes finishes his work and releases these.  That usually comes within four to six weeks after the effective date.  LawReader will post these new statutes as soon as they are released in their final form.  Until then you should review the list of bills adopted by the legislature via use of the link posted above in this article.

iNDEX TO TOPIC HEADINGS OF 2008 LEGISLATION- you can search by topic, then open the bill, but disregard any bill that does not indicate it was passed and signed by the Governor.


Actuarial Analysis
Administrative Regulations and Proceedings
Aeronautics and Aviation
Aged Persons and Aging
Alcoholic Beverages
Amusements and Recreation
Animals, Livestock, and Poultry
Archives and Records
Area Development Districts
Arts and Crafts
Attorney General
Attorney, Commonwealth’s
Attorney, County
Auditor of Public Accounts
Audits and Auditors
Bail and Pretrial Release
Banks and Financial Institutions
Barbers and Cosmetologists
Blind or Deaf Persons
Boats and Boating
Bonds of Surety
Bonds, Public
Budget and Financial Administration
Campaign Finance
Capital Construction
Cemeteries and Burials
Chambers of Commerce
Charitable Organizations and Institutions
Children and Minors
Circuit Clerks
Cities, Classification
Cities, First Class
Cities, Fourth-Sixth Class
Cities, Second Class
Cities, Third Class
Civil Actions
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Collective Bargaining
Commendations and Recognitions
Conference Committee Reports
Confirmation of Appointments
Conflict of Interest
Congressional Districts
Consolidated Local Governments
Constitution, Ky.
Constitution, U.S.
Consumer Affairs
Corrections and Correctional Facilities, State
Corrections Impact
Counties of 75,000 or More
Counties with Cities of the First Class
Counties with Cities of the Third Through Sixth Class
Counties, Urban
County Clerks
County Judge/Executives
Court of Appeals
Court, Supreme
Courts, Circuit
Courts, District
Courts, Fiscal
Crime Victims
Crimes and Punishments
Criminal Procedure
Dairying and Milk Marketing
Data Processing
Deeds and Conveyances
Disabilities and the Disabled
Distilled Spirits
Domestic Relations
Drugs and Medicines
Economic Development
Education, Elementary and Secondary
Education, Finance
Education, Higher
Education, Vocational
Effective Dates, Delayed
Effective Dates, Emergency
Elections and Voting
Embalmers and Funeral Directors
Emergency Medical Services
Eminent Domain and Condemnation
Engineers and Surveyors
Environment and Conservation
Federal Laws and Regulations
Financial Responsibility
Fire Prevention
Firearms and Weapons
Firefighters and Fire Departments
Fiscal Note
Fish and Wildlife
Flood Control and Flooding
Forests and Forestry
General Assembly
Hazardous Materials
Health and Medical Services
Health Benefit Mandate
Highways, Streets, and Bridges
Historical Affairs
Hospitals and Nursing Homes
Hotels and Motels
Housing, Building, and Construction
Information Technology
Insurance, Health
Insurance, Motor Vehicle
Interest and Usury
Interlocal Cooperation
International Trade and Relations
Interstate Cooperation
Jails and Jailers
Judges and Court Commissioners
Juries and Jurors
Justices of the Peace and Magistrates
Labor and Industry
Land Use
Landlord and Tenant
Legislative Research Commission
Lieutenant Governor
Loans and Credit
Local Government
Local Mandate
Malt Beverages
Mental Disability
Mental Health
Military Affairs and Civil Defense
Minerals and Mining
Motor Carriers
Motor Vehicles
News Media
Nuclear Energy
Obscenity and Pornography
Occupational Safety and Health
Occupations and Professions
Oil and Natural Gas
Parental Rights
Parks and Shrines
Peace Officers and Law Enforcement
Personnel and Employment
Physicians and Practitioners
Piggybacked Bills
Planning and Zoning
Plumbers and Plumbing
Police, City and County
Police, State
Popular Names and Short Titles
Probation and Parole
Property Valuation Administrators
Public Advocate
Public Assistance
Public Authorities
Public Buildings and Grounds
Public Health
Public Medical Assistance
Public Officers and Employees
Public Records and Reports
Public Salaries
Public Utilities
Public Works
Real Estate
Reproductive Issues
Research and Methods
Retirement and Pensions
Retroactive Legislation
Science and Technology
Secretary of State
Sewer Systems
Small Business
Special Districts
State Agencies
State Employees
State Symbols and Emblems
Studies Directed
Substance Abuse
Surface Mining
Taxation, Income–Corporate
Taxation, Income–Individual
Taxation, Inheritance and Estate
Taxation, Property
Taxation, Sales and Use
Taxation, Severance
Technical Corrections
Television and Radio
Title Amendments
Trade Practices and Retailing
Traffic Safety
Unemployment Compensation
Unified Local Governments
Uniform Laws
United States
Universities and Colleges
Urban Renewal
Veterans’ Affairs
Wages and Hours
Waste Management
Water Supply
Waterways and Dams
Weights and Measures
Wills and Estates
Withdrawn Legislation
Workers’ Compensation


Free pack sample viagra
Viagra drug interaction
Discount phentermine online
Buy viagra internet
No prior perscription tramadol
Importing cialis from canada to us
Generic viagra and generic drug
Low natural resources for the drug phentermine
Phentermine results
Buy hydrocodone overnight
Buy in phentermine uk
Buy discount viagra online
Leo phentermine order online
Buy prescription tramadol without
Anti cialis impotence
Discount pharmacy phentermine
Soma 350mg
Buy cheap meridia
Cheapest phentermine
Phentermine pills
Viagra cialis levitra comparison
Phentermine overnight delivery no prescription
100 phentermine
Order generic cialis
Cause rebound weight gain phentermine
Tramadol hydrochloride overdose
Buy cheap viagra
Hydrocodone m357
Phentermine cod shipping
Filing income tax tramadol
Order generic viagra
Buy levivia viagra
Free shipping with phentermine order
Phentermine cheapest price
Cheap tramadol cod
Hydrocodone bitartate
Phentermine diet medication
Phentermine 37.5
Phentermine effects on birth control
Side effects of phentermine
Generic cialis softtabs
Get viagra online
Vicodin side effects
Online phentermine pharmacy best cheapest
Phentermine money order
Cheap phentermine online 37 5
Viagra impotence pill
Xanax weight loss
Vicodin picture
Lortab and xanax without a prescription
Cheapest viagra prices
Ambien overdose
Cialis dosages
Tramadol dog
Buspar xanax
Blue xanax
Online viagra prescriptions
Without prescription phentermine
Tramadol effects
Effects of long term xanax use
20mg cialis
Hydrocodone description
Effect viagra
Tramadol no prescription
Between difference levivia viagra
Phentermine sales
Phentermine on line without prescription
_cialis et levitra
Diet diet dieting phentermine pill
Phentermine credit card or cod
Tramadol next day
Buy generic phentermine
Pain medication tramadol
Phentermine message boards
Cialis softtabs
Free cialis samples
Phentermine review
Phentermine in florida
Phentermine shipped cod
Phentermine and birth defects
Phentermine and diet pill
Online doctors perscriptions xanax steroids
Cheapest phentermine 90 day orders
Cheapest phentermine price
Non perscription generic cialis
Drug loss phentermine weight
Buy xanax on line
Can woman take cialis
Meridia order
Xanax and pregnancy
Phentermine vs phentrazine
Adipex p phentermine vs
Hydrocodone picture
Adipex diet phentermine pill
No prescription xanax
I need to identify pictures of phentermine
Online phentermine order
Xanax versus prozac
Cialis discount online
Buy cialis generic
Cialis viagra levivia
Viagra cialis comparison
Viagra retail discount
Free overnight phentermine shipping
Low cost phentermine
Online pharmacy viagra
Us phentermine
Xanax grapefruit juice
Cheapest viagra uk
Xanax drug information
Order tramadol online
Phentermine online pay with mastercard
Cheap xanax online
Effects phentermine side strong
Discounted phentermine with no prescription
Phentermine prescription online
Phentermine hcl
Phentermine online ordering
Cheapest diet phentermine pill
Adipex phentermine prescription
Crystal meth and xanax
Cheapest secure delivery cialis uk
Viagra for woman
Buy xanax without a prescription
Cheap viagra uk
Xanax dosages
Order viagra buying viagra uk
Order phentermine cod
Xanax in early pregnancy
Viagra without a prescription
Phentermine in the uk
Picture viagra pill
Natural supplement for viagra
Fast phentermine
Phentermine xenical diet pill
Online xanax prescription
What do xanax look like
Buy online order viagra
Phentermine tablets
DiflunisalPhentermine addiction help
Woman use viagra
Is phentermine addictive
Cheap meridia
Xanax no prescription required
Viagra sale online
Cheapest place to buy phentermine online
Tramadol hydrochloride capsules
Buy cheap phentermine cod
Atenolol viagra
Phentermine cash on delivery
Buy cheapest online viagra
Cheap phentermine prescription
Drug viagra
Phentermine diet pills
Viagra kaufen
Xanax bar
Buy cod phentermine
Cheap phentermine diet pills
Order soma carisoprodol
Canadian online pharmacy xanax
Xenical hgh phentermine quit smoking
Viagra use in women
Alprazolam xanax
Buy cialis generic online
Phentermine generic
Buy viagra now
Purchase viagra on line
Cialis comparison levitra
Compare cialis levitra
Order cialis uk
Xanax bar effects
Fioricet information
Viagra pill
Order phentermine cod online
Phentermine free shipping 90 supply no delay
Phentermine directly and discreetly adipex
Xanax description
Order viagra viagra online
Cheap 37 5 phentermine
Phentermine and ocular hypertension
Purchase viagra online
Phentermine overnight shipping
Tramadol cause kidney problems
Use of viagra
Purchase soma
Viagrafix corporation

Who will attend the Fancy Farm Debate and Picnic on Saturday Aug. 2nd.

July 14th, 2008

The following politicos have so far said they would appear at Fancy Farm on August 2nd.:

House Majority Floor Leader Rocky Adkins (master of ceremonies), Gov. Steve Beshear, Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo, U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning (who previously said he might never attend again because of safety issues), U.S. Senate candidate Bruce Lunsford, U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield, 1st District U.S. House candidate Heather Ryan, Auditor Crit Luallen, state Sen. Kenneth Winters, state Senate candidate Carroll Hubbard and state Rep. Fred Nesler.
U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell has been invited but has not indicated if he will attend, likewise state Treasurer Todd Hollenbach, state Rep. Steven Rudy and state House candidate Mike Lawrence have not indicated if they will appear. Secretary of State Trey Grayson’s spokesman Les Fugate said the secretary of state will be there.)
Wilson said two presidential candidates, Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama, have been invited and that Obama’s camp had called to ask for the demographics and history of the picnic and area.  If either of the two Presidential candidates appear, then other uncommitted politicians may change their mind and appear.

One problem that confronts Presidential candidates is the difficulty in providing security and running everyone through the necessary metal detectors.
Attorney General Jack Conway and Agriculture Commissioner Richie Farmer have said they would not be attending the political “debate” and picnic.

Fayette Judges meet to seek solution to Public Advocates withdrawal from cases

July 14th, 2008

Update Tuesday July 15th.

 The first legal test of service reductions by public defenders occurred at a closed-door hearing Monday in Fayette Circuit Court, but it’s not clear what rulings, if any, were made. 

After a 31/2- hour hearing in a Lexington juvenile case, public advocate Ernie Lewis said that state public defenders will continue refusing cases for juvenile status offenders. Status offenses are acts that would not be criminal for an adult, such as truancy or running away from home. 

Lewis and other attorneys declined to say what happened in the hearing. Lewis said lawyers were under strict orders from Judge John Schrader not to discuss any details of the case

The Department for Public Advocacy recently indicated that it would not be able to accept appointments in involuntary mental commitment cases, due to the state budget cuts.

Fayette District Judge Joe Bouvier sharply criticized Public Advocates in an order issued June 3rd.  He has ordered the Department of Public Advocacy to take the cases after public defenders in Fayette County withdrew from pending cases.

A meeting of all six Fayette District Judges was scheduled for July 14th. to determine a better way to handle this situation.  Public Defenders will be invited to present evidence to justify their decision to also withdraw from juvenile status offense cases.

County Attorney Larry Roberts indicated he would be at the hearing to oppose the withdrawal by the Department.

On June 30th. the Department filed a lawsuit against the State seeking payment for these services.

Fmr. Bush Aide Karl Rove Ignores Congressional Subpoena, Conyers Threatens to Prosecute for Contempt

July 12th, 2008


By Café              July  12, 2008


Karl Rove has chosen to ignore a subpoena to testify before the House Judiciary Committee in relation to allegations he was part of an administration campaign against officials who did carry out a partisan agenda. By not appearing to testify under subpoena, he has opened himself up to charges of contempt of Congress, and the committee’s chairman, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) has threatened to prosecute Rove if he does not comply, as has Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA), chairwoman of the subcommittee on commercial and administrative law.


Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, claims the former Bush political adviser is “immune” from the subpoena because the accusations relate to a position he held which Luskin argues is covered entirely by “executive privilege”. House Democrats have said this argument not only flies in the face of law and judicial precedent, but is perilously close to arguing that all executive activities are immune from oversight or prosecution (despite Constitutional provisions for both) as a result of executive privilege.


Rep. Conyers said of Rove’s failure to testify: “A refusal to appear in violation of the subpoena could subject Mr. Rove to contempt proceedings, including statutory contempt under federal law and proceedings under the inherent contempt authority of the House of Representatives.” Rep. Sanchez noted that “The courts have made clear that no one —not even the president— is immune from compulsory process. That is what the Supreme Court rules in U.S. v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones.”
The chairman of the Judiciary Committee has also noted that Rove has repeatedly made appearances on cable news broadcasts, including as a paid consultant, and commented on the very issues he refuses to speak about under oath. The fact that he had commented on the issues would, under legal provisions covering actual privilege —such as that between patient and analyst, client and lawyer or among spouses—, negate any claim to privilege on the issue in question.


This fact could work against Mr. Rove if legal proceedings are initiated in an attempt to force him to testify, despite unprecedented efforts by the Bush administration, at times with success, to establish precedent cordoning off nearly all executive consultations from Congressional oversight under the guise of executive privilege or state secrets (itself a principle of British law designed to protect the monarchy).


It remains unclear, however, what action may be taken to force Mr. Rove to testify. If he were to appear before the Congressional committee, he could claim recourse the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution, which guarantees the individual the right not to testify against himself, i.e. not to be forced into admitting wrongdoing. The Judiciary Committee may gather evidence from other witnesses and through document subpoenas, and may also request the Justice Department turn over evidence from related investigations, in order to establish a case against Mr. Rove, then call for his prosecution on evidentiary grounds.


CNN reports that:


Rove’s lawyer cited a letter from the Justice Department saying Rove is “constitutionally immune from compelled congressional testimony.” He said Rove is willing to submit to an “informal interview” or to answer written questions about the prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman, whose ouster Rove is accused of orchestrating.

“Threatening Mr. Rove with sanctions will not in any way expedite the resolution of the issue,” Luskin wrote in a letter to the panel on Wednesday.


Luskin argues that Congress cannot force Rove to testify and that courts will uphold his recourse to executive privilege as a form of blanket immunity from such subpoenas. Rep. Conyers has noted that in the past, acting and former White House officials have testified about activities related to their work in the executive branch, dealing with privilege issue by issue, as questions are put to them; Mr. Rove could follow this course, give testimony and in isolated matters, claim either privilege or 5th Amendment protection, as advised by counsel.

Buy phentermine diet pill
Discount priced viagra
Vicodin online
Online pharmacy phentermine xenical meridia
Free cialis
Online cialis
Vicodin abuse
Iv sample viagra
Generic viagra soft tab
Buy and purchase viagra online
Valium vicodin
Generic india viagra
Phentermine ky
Online pharmacy and phentermine overnight
Viagra patent expiration
Adipex cheap phentermine
Grapefruit viagra
Taking phentermine with antidepressants
Low cost viagra
Order phentermine online uk
Viagra advertisement
Pfizer xanax
Phentermine international order
Viagra cost
How long does xanax stay in your body
Online pharmacy phentermine
Adipex diet discount phentermine pill
Phentermine on sale
Free pack sample viagra
Lose weight with phentermine and 5 htp
Time released phentermine
Cheapest viagra in uk
Cheap viagra in uk
How to stop taking xanax
Discount ambien
Aura soma
Xanax medication
Xanax demerol morphine no prescription needed
Buy viagra on line
Lethal dosage of xanax
Side effects of xanax
Phentermine abuse
Phentermine very cheap
Generic cialis overnight
Cheap xanax
Buy hydrocodone online
Ambien coupon cr
Tramadol hydrochloride overdose
Phentermine 180
Buy viagra order viagra
Cheap cialis generic
Cod diet phentermine pill
Phentermine pillstore
Cheapest viagra uk
Viagra prescriptions
Diet pill xanax
Buy cheapest online viagra
Phentermine versus meridia
Buy cialis viagra
Inject xanax
Buy no online prescription xanax
Cialis comparison viagra
Phentermine 15 mg
Phentermine 37.5 in round white tablets no imprint code
Death cases from taking phentermine
Phentermine yellow 30 mg
Soma getting
20mg cialis
Cheap generic viagra substitutes
Treat crohns disease with viagra
Phentermine credit card or cod
Cialis compare levitra viagra
Buy cheap viagra
Viagra sample
Viagra no prescription
Ativan xanax
Lowest price on phentermine
Phentermine addiction help
Black market phentermine
Online consultation xanax
3mg xanax
Buy cod phentermine
Xanax interaction with paxil
Phentermine 37 5mg and mastercard
Buy viagra in canada
Buy viagra line
Cialis tablet
Phentermine blue 30 mg
How fast does phentermine work
Oxycontin xanax bars perclesept and lortab wha
Buy phentermine tablet
M357 vicodin
Buy cialis without prescription
Natural viagra substitutes
Phentermine ingredients
Xanax drug prescription
Alprazolam xanax
Cialis side effects
Viagra pictures
Butalbital fioricet
Cialis for sale
Order cialis
Natural supplement for viagra
Phentermine pills
Buy phentermine on line
Prozac and phentermine
Ambien sleep aid
Nitric oxide viagra
Xanax without prescription
Herbal alternative to viagra
Buy cheap vicodin
Prescription weight loss medication phentermine
Anxiety panic disorder xanax
Women using viagra
Hydrocodone withdrawal
Viagra in canada
Viagra high blood pressure
Prescription order viagra online
Discount tramadol
Order phentermine c o d
Bad side effects of viagra
Eon phentermine
Vicodin m360
Phentermine hormone
Get phentermine
Free viagra online
Cheap viagra online prescription
Cialis info
Xanax online without a prescription
Generic meridia
Ambien cr dosage
Viagra strip poker flash games
Cheap hydrocodone
Cialis online
Soma online pharmacy
Phentermine picture
Herbal viagra uk
Cheap phentermine online no prescription
Home made viagra
Information loss phentermine weight
Best online deal for phentermine
Phentermine ups shipped
Free ambien
Viagra jokes
Tramadol hcl 50 mg
Generic viagra viagrageneric
Ambien overnight
Best price for viagra in the uk
Buy cialis generic
Cheap phentermine online
Viagra cialis levitra comparison dosages
Viagra suppliers in the uk
Wholesale pfizer viagra
Cheap phentermine online 37 5
Blindness viagra
Phentermine online pay with mastercard
Viagra overnight shipping
Hydrocodone drug test
Hydrocodone withdrawal symptom
Ssri phentermine heart
Low cost phentermine
Oxycodone vs hydrocodone
Phentermine discount no prescription
Cialis drug prescription
Xanax effects
Hydrocodone side effects vicodin
Dangers of viagra
Phentermine buy order
Viagra sales
Cheap phentermine no prescription
Phentermine without perscription
Cialis information
Order xanax overnight
Information phentermine
Fill online prescription viagra
Phentermine on line
Luvox and xanax
Tramadol next day
Compare viagra to cialis
Tramadol medicine
Phentermine without doctor’s approval
Xanax no prescription
Viagra use
Buy hydrocodone
Online xanax prescription
Xanax grapefruit
Cheep phentermine
On line phentermine
Taking viagra or levitra as a booster for cialis
Cialis compare levitra
Cheapest fioricet
Viagra cheap prescription
Cheap diet phentermine pill
Xanax weight gain
Does phentermine work
Hydrocodone guaifenesin
Tramadol narcotic
Phentermine online purchase
Buy ambien